Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38834334›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2024

Identifying subtypes of type 2 diabetes mellitus with machine learning: development, internal validation, prognostic validation and medication burden in linked electronic health records in 420 448 individuals.

Mehrdad A Mizani, Ashkan Dashtban, Laura Pasea, Qingjia Zeng, Kamlesh Khunti, Jonathan Valabhji, Jil Billy Mamza, He Gao, Tamsin Morris, Amitava Banerjee

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mehrdad A MizaniUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2441-895X
Ashkan DashtbanUniversity College London, London, UK.
Laura PaseaUniversity College London, London, UK.
Qingjia ZengUniversity College London, London, UK.
Kamlesh KhuntiDiabetes Research Department, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Jonathan ValabhjiNHS England and NHS Improvement London, London, UK.
Jil Billy MamzaAstraZeneca Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
He GaoAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7764-198X
Tamsin MorrisAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Amitava BanerjeeUniversity College London, London, UK ami.banerjee@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8741-3411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNone of the studies of type 2 diabetes (T2D) subtyping to date have used linked population-level data for incident and prevalent T2D, incorporating a diverse set of variables, explainable methods for cluster characterization, or adhered to an established framework. We aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML)-informed subtypes for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) using nationally representative data. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsIn population-based electronic health records (2006-2020; Clinical Practice Research Datalink) in individuals ≥18 years with incident T2D (n=420 448), we included factors (n=3787), including demography, history, examination, biomarkers and medications. Using a published framework, we identified subtypes through nine unsupervised ML methods (K-means, K-means++, K-mode, K-prototype, mini-batch, agglomerative hierarchical clustering, Birch, Gaussian mixture models, and consensus clustering). We characterized clusters using intracluster distributions and explainable artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. We evaluated subtypes for (1) internal validity (within dataset; across methods); (2) prognostic validity (prediction for 5-year all-cause mortality, hospitalization and new chronic diseases); and (3) medication burden.

results

conclusionsIn the largest study using ML to date in incident T2D, we identified four distinct subtypes, with potential future implications for etiology, therapeutics, and risk prediction.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Electronic Health RecordsMachine LearningAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypoglycemic AgentsIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisHypoglycemic AgentsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Electronic Health RecordsEpidemiologyInformatics

Identifiers

PMID38834334
PMCPMC11163636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.