Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38834316›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Exploring discrimination and racism in healthcare: a qualitative phenomenology study of Dutch persons with migration backgrounds.

Charifa Zemouri, Assia Nait Kassi, Wouter Arrazola de Oñate, Gökhan Çoban, Ama Kissi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intention to Use Primary Healthcare Services among South-South Migrants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charifa ZemouriZemouri et al, Amsterdam, The Netherlands zemouricharifa@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9211-3744
Assia Nait KassiMentalEdGroup, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Wouter Arrazola de OñateVRGT, Brussel, Belgium.
Gökhan ÇobanInstituut Statera, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ama KissiDepartment of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore and characterise the discrimination and racism experienced in healthcare from the perspective of Dutch patients with a migration background.

designThis was a qualitative phenomenological study incorporating an inductive thematic analysis of the answers provided to a free form online survey. Descriptive and differential analyses were conducted for the closed-ended questions.

settingThis study used an online survey distributed in Dutch about experiences of discrimination and racism in healthcare to the general population in the Netherlands.

participantsThe survey was completed by 188 participants (M

resultsFrom the total sample, women, relative to men, were 2.31 times more likely to report experiencing healthcare discrimination (OR=2.31; 95% CI 1.23 to 4.37). The majority of the participants (60.1%) had a Moroccan or Turkish background. Six themes were identified relating to experienced discrimination in healthcare based on one's migration background: (1) explicit discrimination, (2) prejudice, (3) not being taken seriously, (4) discriminatory behaviour, (5) language barriers and (6) pain attribution to cultural background. Some participants reported that their attire or religion was linked to their migration background, thus contributing to their experiences of discrimination.

conclusionDutch patients with a migration background may experience discrimination based on their ethnic identity or other factors related to their backgrounds, such as their faith, culture and skin colour. Discrimination manifests as intersectional and may take different forms (eg, discrimination based on the intersection between race and gender). Therefore, healthcare discrimination may increase health inequities and lead to unequal access to healthcare services. Implicitly or explicitly discriminating against patients is immoral, unethical, illegal and hazardous for individual and public health. Further research on the magnitude of discrimination in healthcare and its relation to health is needed.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchRacismAdultAgedEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrejudiceSocial DiscriminationSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth EquityHealth ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID38834316
PMCPMC11163629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.