Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38834301›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

Shared Mechanisms Drive Ocular Following and Motion Perception.

Philipp Kreyenmeier, Romesh Kumbhani, J Anthony Movshon, Miriam Spering

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philipp KreyenmeierDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 3N9, Canada philipp.kreyenmeier@gmail.com.
Romesh KumbhaniCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5095-0379
J Anthony MovshonCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0274-9213
Miriam SperingDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 3N9, Canada.

Funding

Vision Core Grant- Design and Fabrication ModuleP30EY013079 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ANGELAKI, DORA · 2000 to 2025
$14.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY013079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How features of complex visual patterns are combined to drive perception and eye movements is not well understood. Here we simultaneously assessed human observers' perceptual direction estimates and ocular following responses (OFR) evoked by moving plaids made from two summed gratings with varying contrast ratios. When the gratings were of equal contrast, observers' eye movements and perceptual reports followed the motion of the plaid pattern. However, when the contrasts were unequal, eye movements and reports during early phases of the OFR were biased toward the direction of the high-contrast grating component; during later phases, both responses followed the plaid pattern direction. The shift from component- to pattern-driven behavior resembles the shift in tuning seen under similar conditions in neuronal responses recorded from monkey MT. Moreover, for some conditions, pattern tracking and perceptual reports were correlated on a trial-by-trial basis. The OFR may therefore provide a precise behavioral readout of the dynamics of neural motion integration for complex visual patterns.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualYoung Adulteye movementsocular followingpattern motionperception–action

Identifiers

PMID38834301
PMCPMC11208981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.