Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38834298›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

Functional Dynamics and Selectivity of Two Parallel Corticocortical Pathways from Motor Cortex to Layer 5 Circuits in Somatosensory Cortex.

Hye-Hyun Kim, Kelly E Bonekamp, Grant R Gillie, Dawn M Autio, Tryton Keller, Shane R Crandall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Circuit Organization of the Forelimb-Related M2-to-M1 Corticocortical Pathway in the Mouse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Presynaptic control of top-down signaling in neocortical layer 1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Neuropeptidergic systems in psychiatric disorders.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hye-Hyun KimDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Kelly E BonekampDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Grant R GillieDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Dawn M AutioDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Tryton KellerDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
Shane R CrandallDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 cranda86@msu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0611-3981

Funding

Dynamic properties of neural circuits in the forebrainR01NS117636 · NINDS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Shane R Crandall · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
Dynamic properties of corticothalamic circuitsR00NS096108 · NINDS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CRANDALL, SHANE R · 2018 to 2020
$843k
NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS096108NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS117636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the rodent whisker system, active sensing and sensorimotor integration are mediated in part by the dynamic interactions between the motor cortex (M1) and somatosensory cortex (S1). However, understanding these dynamic interactions requires knowledge about the synapses and how specific neurons respond to their input. Here, we combined optogenetics, retrograde labeling, and electrophysiology to characterize the synaptic connections between M1 and layer 5 (L5) intratelencephalic (IT) and pyramidal tract (PT) neurons in S1 of mice (both sexes). We found that M1 synapses onto IT cells displayed modest short-term depression, whereas synapses onto PT neurons showed robust short-term facilitation. Despite M1 inputs to IT cells depressing, their slower kinetics resulted in summation and a response that increased during short trains. In contrast, summation was minimal in PT neurons due to the fast time course of their M1 responses. The functional consequences of this reduced summation, however, were outweighed by the strong facilitation at these M1 synapses, resulting in larger response amplitudes in PT neurons than IT cells during repetitive stimulation. To understand the impact of facilitating M1 inputs on PT output, we paired trains of inputs with single backpropagating action potentials, finding that repetitive M1 activation increased the probability of bursts in PT cells without impacting the time dependence of this coupling. Thus, there are two parallel but dynamically distinct systems of M1 synaptic excitation in L5 of S1, each defined by the short-term dynamics of its synapses, the class of postsynaptic neurons, and how the neurons respond to those inputs.

Indexed as

Motor CortexOptogeneticsSomatosensory CortexAnimalsExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNeural PathwaysNeuronsPyramidal TractsSynapsesVibrissaecorticocorticallayer 5motoroptogeneticssomatosensorysynapse

Identifiers

PMID38834298
PMCPMC11209671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.