Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38834231›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2024

Effect of retirement on loneliness: a longitudinal comparative analysis across Australia, China and the USA.

Neta Hagani, Philip J Clare, Mengyun Luo, Dafna Merom, Ben J Smith, Ding Ding

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Mapping the factors of loneliness in older adults: the role of employment and work activity - a scoping review.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neta HaganiSchool of Public Health, and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia neta.hagani@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5442-1025
Philip J ClareSchool of Public Health, and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2009-7386
Mengyun LuoSchool of Public Health, and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6482-7299
Dafna MeromWestern Sydney University School of Health Sciences, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6459-8628
Ben J SmithSchool of Public Health, and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6227-5566
Ding DingSchool of Public Health, and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9850-9224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is evidence that the transition to retirement can bring social challenges and may increase loneliness. Few studies have examined the impact of retirement on loneliness; most have been conducted in Western countries. It is important to examine the differences in loneliness postretirement across countries to identify patterns and risk factors that might influence the health and well-being of older adults. We aimed to examine the effect of retirement on loneliness among older adults in Australia, China and the USA.

methodsLongitudinal analysis of data from population-based samples of Australian, Chinese and American adults over 50. Lagged and fully lagged adjusted models were applied. Social engagement was examined as an effect modifier and a sensitivity analysis was conducted among urban participants.

resultsRetirees had a higher predicted prevalence of loneliness than non-retirees in Australia (19.4% (95% CI 18.0% to 20.9%) vs 17.0% (95% CI 15.7% to 18.4%)) and in the USA (19.3% (95% CI 17.5% to 21.1%) vs 15.7% (95% CI 14.3% to 17.3%)). These differences were significant only in the USA. In China, loneliness was significantly lower in those who had retired (10.0% (95% CI 7.9% to 12.5%) vs 17.1% (95% CI 15.7% to 18.5%)). In Australia and the USA, voluntary retirees had the lowest loneliness and involuntary retirees had the highest. Social engagement did not modify the association between retirement and loneliness.

conclusionsOur findings imply that the effect of retirement should be considered within a cultural context to inform suitable and effective strategies to alleviate loneliness.

Indexed as

LonelinessRetirementAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaChinaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsUnited StatesAGINGMENTAL HEALTHPUBLIC HEALTHSOCIAL SCIENCES

Identifiers

PMID38834231
PMCPMC11420738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.