ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2024
Impact of genome build on RNA-seq interpretation and diagnostics.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population-scale detection of methylation outliers from long-read genome sequencing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Bi-allelic RNU6ATAC variants cause a minor spliceopathy characterized by transcriptome-wide minor intron retention and multisystem manifestations.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications.Research square · 2026Article
- Benchmarking RNA-seq Tools for Real-World Diagnostic Applications.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- GREGoR: accelerating genomics for rare diseases.Nature · 2025Article
- Differences in GenBank and RefSeq annotations may affect genomics data interpretation formSphere · 2025Article
- Transcriptome-wide outlier approach identifies individuals with minor spliceopathies.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Assessing the diagnostic impact of blood transcriptome profiling in a pediatric cohort previously assessed by genome sequencing.NPJ genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Integration of transcriptomics and long-read genomics prioritizes structural variants in rare disease.Genome research · 2025Article
- Clinical validation of RNA sequencing for Mendelian disorder diagnostics.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- GREGoR: Accelerating Genomics for Rare Diseases.ArXiv · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcriptomics is a powerful tool for unraveling the molecular effects of genetic variants and disease diagnosis. Prior studies have demonstrated that choice of genome build impacts variant interpretation and diagnostic yield for genomic analyses. To identify the extent genome build also impacts transcriptomics analyses, we studied the effect of the hg19, hg38, and CHM13 genome builds on expression quantification and outlier detection in 386 rare disease and familial control samples from both the Undiagnosed Diseases Network and Genomics Research to Elucidate the Genetics of Rare Disease Consortium. Across six routinely collected biospecimens, 61% of quantified genes were not influenced by genome build. However, we identified 1,492 genes with build-dependent quantification, 3,377 genes with build-exclusive expression, and 9,077 genes with annotation-specific expression across six routinely collected biospecimens, including 566 clinically relevant and 512 known OMIM genes. Further, we demonstrate that between builds for a given gene, a larger difference in quantification is well correlated with a larger change in expression outlier calling. Combined, we provide a database of genes impacted by build choice and recommend that transcriptomics-guided analyses and diagnoses are cross referenced with these data for robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.