ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2024
Proof-of-principle of a lung sealant based on functionalized polyoxazolines: experiments in an ovine acute aerostasis model.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biocompatibility of a novel lung sealant based on functionalized polyoxazolines in an ovine model of parenchymal lung injury.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMore effective lung sealants are needed to prevent prolonged pulmonary air leakage (AL). Polyoxazoline-impregnated gelatin patch (N-hydroxysuccinimide ester functionalized poly(2-oxazoline)s; NHS-POx) was promising for lung sealing ex vivo. The aim of this study is to confirm sealing effectiveness in an in vivo model of lung injury.
methodsAn acute aerostasis model was used in healthy adult female sheep, involving bilateral thoracotomy, amputation lesions (bronchioles Ø > 1.5 mm), sealant application, digital chest tube for monitoring AL, spontaneous ventilation, obduction and bursting pressure measurement. Two experiments were performed: (i) 3 sheep with 2 lesions per lung (N = 4 NHS-POx double-layer, N = 4 NHS-POx single-layer, N = 4 untreated) and (ii) 3 with 1 lesion per lung (N = 3 NHS-POx single-layer, N = 3 untreated). In pooled linear regression, AL was analysed per lung (N = 7 NHS-POx, N = 5 untreated) and bursting pressure per lesion (N = 11 NHS-POx, N = 7 untreated).
resultsBaseline AL was similar between groups (mean 1.38-1.47 l/min, P = 0.90). NHS-POx achieved sealing in 1 attempt in 8/11 (72.7%) and in 10/11 (90.9%) in >1 attempt. Application failures were only observed on triangular lesions requiring 3 folds around the lung. No influences of methodological variation between experiments was detected in linear regression (P > 0.9). AL over initial 3 h of drainage was significantly reduced for NHS-POx [median: 7 ml/min, length of interquartile range: 333 ml/min] versus untreated lesions (367 ml/min, length of interquartile range: 680 ml/min, P = 0.036). Bursting pressure was higher for NHS-POx (mean: 33, SD: 16 cmH2O) versus untreated lesions (mean: 19, SD: 15 cmH2O, P = 0.081).
conclusionsNHS-POx was effective for reducing early AL, and a trend was seen for improvement of bursting strength of the covered defect. Results were affected by application characteristics and lesion geometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.