ArticleThe British journal of radiology2024
Role of effective atomic number of paraspinal muscles in the prediction of acute vertebral fracture risk assessment: a cross-sectional case-control study.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of trabecular texture and paraspinal muscle characteristics with prevalent vertebral fractures - QCT results from a subcohort of the AGES population.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Exercise-responsive crosstalk within local muscle-bone units in osteosarcopenia: from mechanotransduction to secretome signalling.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe aim to investigate the relations among effective atomic number (Zeff), density, and area of paraspinal muscles, volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), and acute vertebral fractures (VF) by using spectral base images (SBIs) and routine CT images.
methodsA total of 223 patients (52 men and 171 women) with acute lumber VF and 776 subjects (286 men and 390 women) without VF of at least 60 years were enrolled and underwent dual-layer detector CT scans. We quantified the cross-sectional area, density (paraSMD), and Zeff of paraspinal muscles by CT images and SBIs and measured vBMD of the lumbar spine by quantitative CT.
resultsHigher vBMD was associated with lower VF risk in both sexes (adjusted OR, 0.33 and 0.43). After adjusting for age and body mass index, the associations of paraSMD with VF were not significant in men, and in women the association was borderline significant (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-1.00). However, higher Zeff of paraspinal muscles was associated with lower VF risk in men (adjusted OR, 0.59; 0.36-0.96) but not in women. The associations of all muscle indexes with VF were not significant after further adjusting for vBMD.
conclusionsA higher Zeff of paraspinal muscles is associated with lower VF risk in older men but not in older women. The density, area, and Zeff of paraspinal muscles were not vBMD independent risk factors for acute VF. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The effective atomic number of paraspinal muscles might be a potential marker for VF risk prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.