ArticleAIDS care2024
Use of machine learning approaches to predict transition of retention in care among people living with HIV in South Carolina: a real-world data study.
Article in AIDS care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visit-level prediction of missed HIV appointments using machine learning and transformer-based models in Uganda.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Application in Enhancing HIV Management and Treatment Outcomes: Revolutionizing HIV Infection.Current HIV research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maintaining retention in care (RIC) for people living with HIV (PLWH) helps achieve viral suppression and reduce onward transmission. This study aims to identify the best machine learning model that predicts the RIC transition over time. Extracting from the enhanced HIV/AIDS reporting system, this study included 9765 PLWH from 2005 to 2020 in South Carolina. Transition of RIC was defined as the change of RIC status in each two-year time window. We applied seven classifiers, such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, eXtreme Gradient Boosting and Long-short-term memory, for each lagged response to predict the subsequent year's RIC transition. Classification performance was assessed using balanced prediction accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC), recall, precision and F1 scores. The proportion of the four categories of RIC transition was 13.59%, 29.78%, 9.06% and 47.57%, respectively. Support Vector Machine was the best approach for every lag model based on both the F1 score (0.713, 0.717 and 0.719) and AUC (0.920, 0.925 and 0.928). The findings could facilitate the risk augment of PLWH who are prone to follow-up so that clinicians and policymakers could come up with more specific strategies and relocate resources for intervention to keep them sustained in HIV care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.