Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38833279›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

A Community Mental Health Integrated Disaster Preparedness Intervention for Bushfire Recovery in Rural Australian Communities: Protocol for a Multimethods Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study.

Caitlin E Pike, Henriette C Dohnt, Phillip J Tully, Warren Bartik, Courtney Welton-Mitchell, Clara V Murray, Kylie Rice, Suzanne M Cosh, Amy D Lykins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caitlin E PikeSchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-2058-9161
Henriette C DohntSchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1523-6492
Phillip J TullySchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2807-1313
Warren BartikSchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8344-3306
Courtney Welton-MitchellColorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Colorado, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4659-8728
Clara V MurraySchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9594-7421
Kylie RiceSchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7072-5619
Suzanne M CoshSchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8003-3704
Amy D LykinsSchool of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2930-3964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural hazards are increasing in frequency and intensity due to climate change. Many of these natural disasters cannot be prevented; what may be reduced is the extent of the risk and negative impact on people and property. Research indicates that the 2019-2020 bushfires in Australia (also known as the "Black Summer Bushfires") resulted in significant psychological distress among Australians both directly and indirectly exposed to the fires. Previous intervention research suggests that communities impacted by natural hazards (eg, earthquakes, hurricanes, and floods) can benefit from interventions that integrate mental health and social support components within disaster preparedness frameworks. Research suggests that disaster-affected communities often prefer the support of community leaders, local services, and preexisting relationships over external supports, highlighting that community-based interventions, where knowledge stays within the local community, are highly beneficial. The Community-Based Disaster Mental Health Intervention (CBDMHI) is an evidence-based approach that aims to increase disaster preparedness, resilience, social cohesion, and social support (disaster-related help-seeking), and decrease mental health symptoms, such as depression and anxiety.

objectiveThis research aims to gain insight into rural Australian's recovery needs post natural hazards, and to enhance community resilience in advance of future fires. Specifically, this research aims to adapt the CBDMHI for the rural Australian context and for bushfires and second, to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the adapted CBDMHI in a rural Australian community.

methodsPhase 1 consists of qualitative interviews (individual or dyads) with members of the target bushfire-affected rural community. Analysis of these data will include identifying themes related to disaster preparedness, social cohesion, and mental health, which will inform the adaptation. An initial consultation phase is a key component of the adaptation process and, therefore, phase 2 will involve additional discussion with key stakeholders and members of the community to further guide adaptation of the CBDMHI to specific community needs, building on phase 1 inputs. Phase 3 includes identifying and training local community leaders in the adapted intervention. Following this, leaders will co-deliver the intervention. The acceptability and feasibility of the adapted CBDMHI within the community will be evaluated by questionnaires and semistructured interviews. Effectiveness will be evaluated by quantifying psychological distress, resilience, community cohesion, psychological preparedness, and help-seeking intentions.

resultsThis study has received institutional review board approval and commenced phase 1 recruitment in October 2022.

conclusionsThe study will identify if the adapted CBDMHI is viable and acceptable within a village in the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales, Australia. These findings will inform future scale-up in the broader rural Australian context. If this intervention is well received, the CBDMHI may be valuable for future disaster recovery and preparedness efforts in rural Australia. These findings may inform future scale-up in the broader rural Australian context. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/53454.

Indexed as

Disaster PlanningFeasibility StudiesRural PopulationWildfiresAustraliaCommunity Mental Health ServicesFemaleFiresHumansMaleMental HealthPilot Projectsbushfirescommunity interventionsdisasterdisaster preparednesshelp-seekingmental healthmixed-methodsnatural disastersnatural hazardnatural hazards resiliencepilot studypreparationpreparednesspsychological distressresiliencerural mental healthwildfires

Identifiers

PMID38833279
PMCPMC11185912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.