Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38833259›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

Choroidalyzer: An Open-Source, End-to-End Pipeline for Choroidal Analysis in Optical Coherence Tomography.

Justin Engelmann, Jamie Burke, Charlene Hamid, Megan Reid-Schachter, Dan Pugh, Neeraj Dhaun, Diana Moukaddem, Lyle Gray, Niall Strang, Paul McGraw and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Justin EngelmannSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jamie BurkeSchool of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Charlene HamidClinical Research Facility and Imaging, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Megan Reid-SchachterClinical Research Facility and Imaging, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Dan PughBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Neeraj DhaunBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Diana MoukaddemDepartment of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Lyle GrayDepartment of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Niall StrangDepartment of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Paul McGrawSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Amos StorkeyInstitute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Paul J SteptoePrincess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Stuart KingSchool of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Tom MacGillivrayClinical Research Facility and Imaging, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Miguel O BernabeuCentre for Medical Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ian J C MacCormickInstitute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop Choroidalyzer, an open-source, end-to-end pipeline for segmenting the choroid region, vessels, and fovea, and deriving choroidal thickness, area, and vascular index. Methods: We used 5600 OCT B-scans (233 subjects, six systemic disease cohorts, three device types, two manufacturers). To generate region and vessel ground-truths, we used state-of-the-art automatic methods following manual correction of inaccurate segmentations, with foveal positions manually annotated. We trained a U-Net deep learning model to detect the region, vessels, and fovea to calculate choroid thickness, area, and vascular index in a fovea-centered region of interest. We analyzed segmentation agreement (AUC, Dice) and choroid metrics agreement (Pearson, Spearman, mean absolute error [MAE]) in internal and external test sets. We compared Choroidalyzer to two manual graders on a small subset of external test images and examined cases of high error. Results: Choroidalyzer took 0.299 seconds per image on a standard laptop and achieved excellent region (Dice: internal 0.9789, external 0.9749), very good vessel segmentation performance (Dice: internal 0.8817, external 0.8703), and excellent fovea location prediction (MAE: internal 3.9 pixels, external 3.4 pixels). For thickness, area, and vascular index, Pearson correlations were 0.9754, 0.9815, and 0.8285 (internal)/0.9831, 0.9779, 0.7948 (external), respectively (all P < 0.0001). Choroidalyzer's agreement with graders was comparable to the intergrader agreement across all metrics. Conclusions: Choroidalyzer is an open-source, end-to-end pipeline that accurately segments the choroid and reliably extracts thickness, area, and vascular index. Especially choroidal vessel segmentation is a difficult and subjective task, and fully automatic methods like Choroidalyzer could provide objectivity and standardization.

Indexed as

ChoroidTomography, Optical CoherenceAdultAgedDeep LearningFemaleFovea CentralisHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetinal Vessels

Identifiers

PMID38833259
PMCPMC11156207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.