SynthesisJAMA network open2024
Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the Era of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Neoadjuvant therapy combined with immunotherapy for anal sphincter preservation rate, clinical efficacy, and safety in rectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic value of quantitative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging parameters and histopathologic features for disease-free survival in locally advanced non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Quality of Life After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer in the SHORT-FOX Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Non-operative management of rectal adenocarcinoma in a safety-net system: a decade of real-world outcomes outside watch-and-wait eligibility.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of Circumferential Resection Margin in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer in Spain: results from a national patterns-of-care survey by the SEOR-GI Group.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Global Curriculum in Surgical Oncology: 2nd Edition, 2026.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Prognostic and Predictive Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Managed With Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Real-World Tumor Response and Clinical Outcomes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Prognostic Role of Postoperative Inflammation After Minimally Invasive Resection for Colorectal Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Watch-and-wait in rectal cancer: A critical appraisal of promise, perils and unresolved contours of organ preservation (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- [Anorectal functional disorders following organ-preserving treatment and resection of rectal cancer].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- EFHD2 drives lactate-mediated DNA damage repair and immunosuppression via HMGB1 and HIF-1α to confer radioresistance in colorectal cancer.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Safety and Tolerability of Different Total Neoadjuvant Therapies in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Personalized neoadjuvant treatment regimen selection in locally advanced rectal cancer based on regimen-specific response modeling.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- MRI-based multiregional radiomics for pretreatment prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a bicenter study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Four clinical dilemmas in surgical decision making for low rectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Evaluating the impact of GLP-1 receptor agonists in combination with total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.The British journal of surgery · 2026Review
- Bony pelvic resection is a risk factor for pelvic abscess after total pelvic exenteration for pelvic malignancies.Surgery today · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) protocols (ie, preoperative chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy) may allow better adherence and early treatment of distant micrometastases and may increase pathological complete response (pCR) rates. Objective: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of TNT protocols for LARC. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science Core Collection electronic databases and ClinicalTrials.gov for unpublished studies were searched from inception to March 2, 2024. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials including adults with LARC who underwent rectal resection as a final treatment were included. Studies including nonoperative treatment (watch-and-wait strategy), treatments other than rectal resection, immunotherapy, or antiangiogenic agents were excluded. Among the initially identified studies, 2.9% met the selection criteria. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two authors independently screened the records and extracted data. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)-compliant pairwise and network meta-analyses with a random-effects model were performed in a frequentist framework, and the certainty of evidence was assessed according to the confidence in network meta-analysis approach. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was pCR, defined as the absence of residual tumor at pathological assessment after surgery. Secondary outcomes included tolerability, toxic effects, perioperative outcomes, and long-term survival. Results: Of 925 records identified, 27 randomized clinical trials, including 13 413 adults aged 18 years or older (median age, 60.0 years [range, 42.0-63.5 years]; 67.2% male) contributed to the primary network meta-analysis. With regard to pCR, long-course chemoradiotherapy (L-CRT) plus consolidation chemotherapy (relative risk [RR], 1.96; 95% CI, 1.25-3.06), short-course radiotherapy (S-RT) plus consolidation chemotherapy (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.34-2.30), and induction chemotherapy plus L-CRT (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.09-2.25) outperformed standard L-CRT with single-agent fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. Considering 3-year disease-free survival, S-RT plus consolidation chemotherapy (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14) and induction chemotherapy plus L-CRT (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.24) outperformed L-CRT, in spite of an increased 5-year locoregional recurrence rate of S-RT plus consolidation chemotherapy (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.03-2.63). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, 3 TNT protocols were identified to outperform the current standard of care in terms of pCR rates, with good tolerability and optimal postoperative outcomes, suggesting they should be recognized as first-line treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.