ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2024
Effects of centrifugation treatment before electroporation on gene editing in pig embryos.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic mosaicism, characterized by multiple genotypes within an individual, is considered an obstacle to CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in animal models. Despite the various strategies for minimizing mosaic mutations, no definitive methods exist to eliminate them. This study aimed to enhance gene editing efficiency in porcine zygotes using CRISPR/Cas9, which targets specific genes through centrifugation and zona pellucida removal before electroporation. Centrifugation at 2000 × g did not adversely affect blastocyst formation rates in zygotes electroporated with gRNA targeting the GGTA1 gene; instead, it led to increased total and monoallelic mutation rates compared with control zygotes without centrifugation. However, the groups had no significant differences in biallelic mutation rates. In zygotes electroporated with gRNA targeting the CMAH gene, centrifugation treatments exceeding 1000 × g significantly increased both biallelic mutation rates and mutation efficiency. The combination of centrifugation and zona pellucida removal did not have a detrimental effect on blastocyst formation rates. It led to a higher rate of double biallelic mutations in embryos targeting both GGTA1 and CMAH compared to embryos without centrifugation treatment. In summary, our results demonstrate that pre-electroporation treatments, including centrifugation and zona pellucida removal, positively influenced the reduction of mosaic mutations, with the effectiveness of centrifugation depending on the specific gRNA used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38833208What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.