Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38833207›Full record

ArticleScience and engineering ethics2024

AI Through Ethical Lenses: A Discourse Analysis of Guidelines for AI in Healthcare.

Laura Arbelaez Ossa, Stephen R Milford, Michael Rost, Anja K Leist, David M Shaw, Bernice S Elger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Ethical and Legal Governance of Generative AI in Chinese Healthcare.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura Arbelaez OssaInstitute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. laura.arbelaezossa@unibas.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-8303-8789
Stephen R MilfordInstitute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7325-9940
Michael RostInstitute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6537-9793
Anja K LeistInstitute for Research on Socio-Economic Inequality (IRSEI) in the Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-Sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-5074-5209
David M ShawInstitute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8180-6927
Bernice S ElgerInstitute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4249-7399

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 407740_187263 /1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the technologies that enable Artificial Intelligence (AI) continue to advance rapidly, there are increasing promises regarding AI's beneficial outputs and concerns about the challenges of human-computer interaction in healthcare. To address these concerns, institutions have increasingly resorted to publishing AI guidelines for healthcare, aiming to align AI with ethical practices. However, guidelines as a form of written language can be analyzed to recognize the reciprocal links between its textual communication and underlying societal ideas. From this perspective, we conducted a discourse analysis to understand how these guidelines construct, articulate, and frame ethics for AI in healthcare. We included eight guidelines and identified three prevalent and interwoven discourses: (1) AI is unavoidable and desirable; (2) AI needs to be guided with (some forms of) principles (3) trust in AI is instrumental and primary. These discourses signal an over-spillage of technical ideals to AI ethics, such as over-optimism and resulting hyper-criticism. This research provides insights into the underlying ideas present in AI guidelines and how guidelines influence the practice and alignment of AI with ethical, legal, and societal values expected to shape AI in healthcare.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDelivery of Health CareGuidelines as TopicTrustHumansMoralsAI ethicsAI guidelinesArtificial intelligenceEthicsGuidelinesHealthcareRegulationsRegulatory affairs

Identifiers

PMID38833207
PMCPMC11150179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.