Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38833188›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2024

Photon-Counting Computed Tomography for Microstructural Imaging of Bone and Joints.

Jilmen Quintiens, G Harry van Lenthe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jilmen QuintiensDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2007-9329
G Harry van LentheDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. harry.vanlenthe@kuleuven.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8303-4959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRecently, photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) has been introduced in clinical research and diagnostics. This review describes the technological advances and provides an overview of recent applications with a focus on imaging of bone. RECENT

findingsPCCT is a full-body scanner with short scanning times that provides better spatial and spectral resolution than conventional energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT), along with an up to 50% reduced radiation dose. It can be used to quantify bone mineral density, to perform bone microstructural analyses and to assess cartilage quality with adequate precision and accuracy. Using a virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction, metal artefacts can be greatly reduced when imaging bone-implant interfaces. Current PCCT systems do not allow spectral imaging in ultra-high-resolution (UHR) mode. Given its improved resolution, reduced noise and spectral imaging capabilities PCCT has diagnostic capacities in both qualitative and quantitative imaging that outperform those of conventional CT. Clinical use in monitoring bone health has already been demonstrated. The full potential of PCCT systems will be unlocked when UHR spectral imaging becomes available.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesBone DensityTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansJointsPhotonsBone microarchitectureBone mineral densityPhoton-counting CTQualitative imagingQuantitative imaging

Identifiers

PMID38833188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.