Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38833165›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Evaluating and Enhancing Large Language Models' Performance in Domain-Specific Medicine: Development and Usability Study With DocOA.

Xi Chen, Li Wang, MingKe You, WeiZhi Liu, Yu Fu, Jie Xu, Shaoting Zhang, Gang Chen, Kang Li, Jian Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A multi-layer retrieval-augmented large language model framework for enhancing hypertension education.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xi Chen *Sports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0165-6426
Li Wang *Sports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3260-5998
MingKe YouSports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7608-5456
WeiZhi LiuSports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0009-0004-5917-212X
Yu FuWest China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0009-0001-3427-3344
Jie XuShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, OpenMedLab, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9233-4363
Shaoting ZhangShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, OpenMedLab, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8719-448X
Gang ChenSports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7322-5292
Kang Li *Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, OpenMedLab, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8136-9816
Jian Li *Sports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0376-0702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of large language models (LLMs) in domain-specific medicine, particularly for managing complex diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA), remains largely unexplored.

objectiveThis study focused on evaluating and enhancing the clinical capabilities and explainability of LLMs in specific domains, using OA management as a case study.

methodsA domain-specific benchmark framework was developed to evaluate LLMs across a spectrum from domain-specific knowledge to clinical applications in real-world clinical scenarios. DocOA, a specialized LLM designed for OA management integrating retrieval-augmented generation and instructional prompts, was developed. It can identify the clinical evidence upon which its answers are based through retrieval-augmented generation, thereby demonstrating the explainability of those answers. The study compared the performance of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and a specialized assistant, DocOA, using objective and human evaluations.

resultsResults showed that general LLMs such as GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 were less effective in the specialized domain of OA management, particularly in providing personalized treatment recommendations. However, DocOA showed significant improvements.

conclusionsThis study introduces a novel benchmark framework that assesses the domain-specific abilities of LLMs in multiple aspects, highlights the limitations of generalized LLMs in clinical contexts, and demonstrates the potential of tailored approaches for developing domain-specific medical LLMs.

Indexed as

Machine LearningOsteoarthritisHumansdomain-specific benchmark frameworklarge language modelosteoarthritis managementretrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID38833165
PMCPMC11301122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.