ArticleNeuroradiology2024
Incomplete partition type II in its various manifestations: isolated, in association with EVA, syndromic, and beyond; a multicentre international study.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Audio-Vestibular Evaluation of Pediatric Pseudo-Conductive Hearing Loss: Third Window Syndromes.Audiology research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIncomplete partition type II (IP-II) is characterized by specific histological features and radiological appearance. It may occur in isolation or in association with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA). Among those with IP-II and EVA, a subset has a diagnosis of Pendred syndrome. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of isolated IP-II, IP-II with EVA, and cases with a genetic or syndromic basis in our cohort.
methodsFrom a large, multicentre database of dysplastic cochleae (446 patients, 892 temporal bones), those with imaging features of IP-II were examined in detail, including whether there was a genetic or syndromic association.
resultsA total of 78 patients with IP-II were identified. Among these, 55 patients had bilateral IP-II and EVA (only 12 with typical Mondini triad), 8 with bilateral IP-II and normal VA, 2 with bilateral IP-II and unilateral EVA, and 13 with unilateral IP-II (9 with unilateral EVA). Among the group with bilateral IP-II and bilateral EVA in whom genetic analysis was available, 14 out of 29 (48%) had SLC26A4 mutations and a diagnosis of Pendred syndrome, 1 had a FOXI1 mutation, and a few other genetic abnormalities; none had KCNJ10 pathogenic variants.
conclusionBilateral IP-II-bilateral EVA may be seen in the context of Pendred syndrome (SLC26A4 or FOXI1 mutations) but, in the majority of our cohort, no genetic abnormalities were found, suggesting the possibility of unknown genetic associations. IP-II in isolation (without EVA) is favored to be genetic when bilateral, although the cause is often unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38833161What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.