Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38833159›Full record

ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Scientific methods for in-vitro investigations in the field of joint kinematics : Cluster experimental joint kinematics].

Dennis Nebel, Christoph Thorwächter, Stefan Schröder, Toni Wendler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dennis NebelLabor für Biomechanik und Biomaterialien, Orthopädische Klinik - DIAKOVERE Annastift, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. nebel.dennis@mh-hannover.de.
Christoph ThorwächterKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland.
Stefan SchröderSektion für Biomechanik und Implantatforschung, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Toni WendlerZESBO - Zentrum zur Erforschung der Stütz- und Bewegungsorgane, Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universität Leipzig - Medizinische Fakultät, Leipzig, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro studies are an established method to determine joint kinematics for answering preclinical questions regarding the effects of new treatment options, surgical techniques or implant designs. The lack of standardized, interdisciplinary representation in the determination of joint kinematics poses a problem. In addition to representation forms such as the "neutral-zero method" or the description of movements within the three basic planes, there are other mathematical joint-specific representations of individual working groups. The International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) has already made recommendations for standardization, but most of these cannot be implemented in biomechanical in-vitro studies. The cluster has therefore set itself the goal of standardizing in-vitro test methods in order to achieve better comparability of scientific results from different working groups.

Indexed as

JointsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansIn Vitro TechniquesModels, BiologicalRange of Motion, ArticularAnatomical coordinate systemsBiomechanicsForms of movement presentationMotion captureMotion test setups

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.