ArticleObesity surgery2024
Gestational Diabetes Risk and Low Birth Weight After Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: a Complex Interplay to be Balanced.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- When to conceive following metabolic-bariatric surgery to optimize both surgical weight loss and gestational weight gain.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- The outcomes of pregnancy after metabolic and bariatric surgery: a literature review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Review
- Pregnancy After Bariatric Surgery: Hepatobiliary Implications, Maternal Outcomes, and Clinical Considerations.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMetabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is known to improve the obstetric outcomes of women with obesity and to prevent gestational diabetes (GD). To what extent does MBS decreases GD, without incurring at additional risks is a matter of concern.
methodsA retrospective case-control study to compare the pregnancy outcomes of women previously submitted to MBS to those of age and preconception body mass index (PC BMI) matched non-operated controls.
resultsPregnancies of women after MBS (n = 79) and matched controls (n = 79) were included. GD was significantly less frequent after MBS (7.6% vs. 19%; p = 0.03). Fasting blood glucose (76.90 ± 0.77 vs 80.37 ± 1.15 mg/dl, p < 0.05; 70.08 ± 1.34 vs. 76.35 ± 0.95 mg/dl; p < 0.05, first and second trimesters respectively) and birth weight (2953.67 ± 489.51 g vs. 3229.11 ± 476.21 g; p < 0.01) were significantly lower after MBS when compared to controls. The occurrence of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) was more frequent after MBS (22.8% vs. 6.3%; p < 0.01), but no longer significant after controlling for smoking habits (15.5% vs. 6%, p = 0.14). There were no significant differences in gestational weight gain, prematurity rate nor mode of delivery between groups.
conclusionMBS was associated with a lower prevalence of GD than observed in non-operated women with the same age and BMI. After controlling for smoking, this occurred at the expense of a lower birth weight. Our data reinforces the hypothesis that MBS has body weight independent effects on glucose kinetics during pregnancy with distinctive impacts for mother and offspring, which need to be balanced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.