Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38833119›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2024

Indications and outcomes of the MitraClip G4 device with controlled gripper actuation system.

Naoki Nishiura, Shunsuke Kubo, Mikitaka Fujita, Kazunori Mushiake, Sachiyo Ono, Kohei Osakada, Takeshi Maruo, Kazushige Kadota

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Naoki NishiuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Shunsuke KuboDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan. sk12750@kchnet.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4794-7843
Mikitaka FujitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Kazunori MushiakeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Sachiyo OnoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Kohei OsakadaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Takeshi MaruoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Kazushige KadotaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1, Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The MitraClip G4 device has controlled gripper actuation (CGA) system, which allows the anterior and posterior grippers operate separately in transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). We investigated the indications and outcomes of the use of CGA system during TEER for significant mitral regurgitation (MR). We reviewed 158 patients undergoing TEER with MitraClip G4 from September 2020 to July 2023. The CGA indications were: (1) for grasping and (2) for leaflet insertion confirmation. Leaflet grasping was completed with CGA in 18 patients (11 and 7 patients for grasping and leaflet insertion confirmation, respectively). Patients with flail leaflets or coaptation gap more frequently required CGA, indicating more complex mitral valve anatomy. The procedural success and adverse event rates (death, leaflet tear and single leaflet device attachment) were not different between the CGA and non-CGA groups. In patients requiring CGA, single leaflet device attachment was observed in 1 patient and leaflet tear in 1 patient during follow-up. In these two cases, CGA was required for grasping, and the clip was moved over a large distance (6.5 and 12.4 mm, respectively). In patients who had undergone CGA for confirmation, no device-related adverse event or MR recurrence was noted. In patients with complex mitral valve anatomy, CGA may be a safe and effective method for confirming leaflet insertion. It should be noted that when using CGA for leaflet grasping, especially when the clip is moved significantly, attention should be paid to leaflet adverse events.

Indexed as

Mitral ValveMitral Valve InsufficiencyAgedAged, 80 and overCardiac CatheterizationEchocardiography, TransesophagealFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeMitral regurgitationStructural heart diseaseTranscatheter edge-to-edge repair

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.