Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38833111›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

Insights from telesurgery expert conference on recent clinical experience and current status of remote surgery.

Bernardo Rocco, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Shady Saikali, Giorgia Gaia, Vipul Patel, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07130708 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Advancing Humanitarian Healthcare: Exploring the Potential of Robotic Telesurgery in Remote Settings - A Multicentric Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdventHealthRan2025 to 2033Enrolled10ConditionsProstate Carcinoma, Prostate DiseaseArmsTelesurgery utilizing Microport Medbot Robotic Platform
NCT07792109 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Implementation Of A Telesurgery Program At A Referral Center For Robotic Surgery: Feasibility And Safety Evaluation - Gemelli TeleSurgery Program (GTSP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2026 to 2027Enrolled25ConditionsProstate Cancer, Colorectal CancerArmsRobot-Assisted Telesurgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Feasibility and Initial Outcomes of Telesurgery in Urology: a Systematic Review of the Literature.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  4. Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted remote radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on 5G communication technology (FUTURE-04): a prospective, single-arm clinical trial.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bernardo RoccoUrology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, University of Milan, via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy.
Marcio Covas MoschovasAdventhealth, Global Robotic Institute, Celebration, FL, 34747, USA.
Shady SaikaliAdventhealth, Global Robotic Institute, Celebration, FL, 34747, USA.
Giorgia GaiaGynecology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Vipul PatelAdventhealth, Global Robotic Institute, Celebration, FL, 34747, USA.
Maria Chiara SighinolfiUrology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, University of Milan, via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy. sighinolfic@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote surgery provides opportunity for enhanced surgical capabilities, wider healthcare reach, and potentially improved patient outcomes. The network reliability is the foundation of successful implementation of telesurgery. It relies on a robust, high-speed communication network, with ultra-low latency. Significant lag has been shown to endanger precision and safety. Furthermore, the full-fledged adoption of telerobotics demands careful consideration of ethical challenges too. A deep insight into these issues has been investigated during the first Telesurgery Consensus Conference that took place in Orlando, Florida, USA, on the 3rd and 4th of February, 2024. During the Conference, the state of the art of remote surgery has been reported from robotic systems displaying telesurgery potential. The Hinotori, a robotic-assisted surgery platform developed by Medicaroid, experienced remote surgery as pre-clinical testing only; the Edge Medical Company, Shenzen, China, reported more than one hundred animal and 30 live human surgeries; the KanGuo reported human telesurgical cases performed with distances more than 3000 km; the Microport, China, collected more than 100 human operations at a distance up to 5000 km. Though, several issues-cybersecurity, data privacy, technical malfunctions - are yet to be addressed before a successful telesurgery implementation. Expanding the discussion to encompass ethical, financial, regulatory, and legal considerations is essential too. The Telesurgery collaborative community is working together to address and establish the best practices in the field.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresTelemedicineAnimalsChinaComputer SecurityCongresses as TopicHumansLatencyNetwork structureRemote surgeryRobotic surgeryTelesurgery

Identifiers

PMID38833111
PMCPMC11150305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.