Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38833067›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2024

A phase 1/1b, open-label, dose-escalation study of PD-1 inhibitor, cetrelimab alone and in combination with FGFR inhibitor, erdafitinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Noboru Yamamoto, Yasutoshi Kuboki, Kenichi Harano, Takafumi Koyama, Shunsuke Kondo, Akiko Hagiwara, Noriko Suzuki, Ei Fujikawa, Kiichiro Toyoizumi, Mayumi Mukai and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Noboru YamamotoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasutoshi KubokiDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Kenichi HaranoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Takafumi KoyamaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunsuke KondoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko HagiwaraResearch and Development Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko SuzukiResearch and Development Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Ei FujikawaResearch and Development Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Kiichiro ToyoizumiResearch and Development Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Mayumi MukaiResearch and Development Division, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Toshihiko DoiDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan. tdoi@east.ncc.go.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the leading approaches in tumor immunotherapy. The aim of the study was to establish recommended phase 2 doses (RP2Ds) of intravenous cetrelimab, a checkpoint inhibitor, alone and with oral erdafitinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. This open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation phase 1/1b study enrolled adults with advanced solid tumors who were ineligible for standard therapy. Study was conducted in two parts: phase 1a assessed cetrelimab at three dosing levels (80 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W], 240 mg Q2W, and 480 mg Q4W); phase 1b assessed cetrelimab+erdafitinib at two dosing levels (240 mg Q2W + 6 mg once daily [QD] and 240 mg Q2W + 8 mg QD). Primary endpoint was frequency and severity of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of cetrelimab ± erdafitinib. In total 22 patients (phase 1a, n = 9; phase 1b, n = 13) were enrolled. Median duration of follow-up was 8.64 months in phase 1a and 2.33 months in phase 1b. In phase 1a, DLTs weren't reported while in phase 1b, 1 patient who received 240 mg cetrelimab + 6 mg erdafitinib reported Stevens-Johnson syndrome (grade 3, immune-related). Overall, 88.9% patients in phase 1a (grade ≥ 3: 44.4%) and 100.0% in phase 1b (grade ≥ 3: 53.8%) experienced ≥ 1 treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs); 33.3% in phase 1a and 38.5% in phase 1b reported serious TEAEs, of which 11.1% patients in phase 1a and 15.4% in phase 1b had TEAEs which led to treatment discontinuation. Cetrelimab alone and in combination with erdafitinib showed manageable safety in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. RP2Ds were determined as 480 mg cetrelimab Q4W for monotherapy, and cetrelimab 240 mg Q2W + erdafitinib 8 mg QD for combination therapy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNeoplasmsPyrazolesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDose-Response Relationship, DrugEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsJapanMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizederdafitinibImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorPyrazolesQuinoxalinesReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorFGFR inhibitorImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMonoclonal antibodySmall molecule inhibitorTargeted cancer therapy

Identifiers

PMID38833067
PMCPMC11327176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.