Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38833002›Full record

ArticleCalcified tissue international2024

Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Hip Fractures are Commonly Classified as Having Osteoporosis Based on DXA Measurements.

Jacob Ritter, Assil-Ramin Alimy, Alexander Simon, Jan Hubert, Christian Ries, Tim Rolvien, Frank Timo Beil

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Calcified tissue international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures are older adults who are commonly diagnosed with osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jacob RitterDivision of Orthopaedics, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Assil-Ramin AlimyDivision of Orthopaedics, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Alexander SimonDivision of Orthopaedics, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan HubertDivision of Orthopaedics, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian RiesDivision of Orthopaedics, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Tim Rolvien *Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. t.rolvien@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1058-1307
Frank Timo Beil *Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periprosthetic femoral hip fractures are subject to an increasing incidence and are often considered to be related to osteoporosis. However, there are no available studies that have determined the frequency of osteoporosis in affected patients using gold standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In this retrospective comparative study, we analyzed the DXA results of 40 patients with periprosthetic femoral hip fractures who were treated surgically in our department. DXA measurements were performed at the total hip and the lumbar spine to determine bone mineral density T-scores. Data were compared to two age-, sex-, and BMI-matched control groups in which patients underwent DXA prior to aseptic revision surgery for other causes or primary THA (consisting of 40 patients each). The mean T-score in the periprosthetic fracture cohort was significantly lower (- 1.78 ± 1.78) than that of the aseptic revision (- 0.65 ± 1.58, mean difference - 1.13 [95% CI - 1.88 to - 0.37]; p = 0.001) and the primary THA cohort (- 0.77 ± 1.34, mean difference - 1.01 [95% CI - 1.77 to - 0.26]; p = 0.005). Accordingly, osteoporosis was detected more frequently (45%) in the fracture cohort compared to patients undergoing aseptic revision (12.5%) and primary THA (10%). In conclusion, almost half of the patients with periprosthetic femoral hip fractures have osteoporosis according to DXA measurements. A regular assessment of bone health in THA enables identification of patients with osteoporosis who likely benefit from initiation of osteoporosis medication and cemented stem fixation.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonHip FracturesOsteoporosisPeriprosthetic FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesDual-energy X-ray absorptiometryOsteoporosisPeriprosthetic fractureTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID38833002
PMCPMC11246254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.