Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38832775›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2024

Random forest machine-learning algorithm classifies white- and brown-rot fungi according to the number of the genes encoding Carbohydrate-Active enZyme families.

Natsuki Hasegawa, Masashi Sugiyama, Kiyohiko Igarashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natsuki HasegawaDepartment of Biomaterial Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masashi SugiyamaCenter for Advanced Intelligence Project, RIKEN, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyohiko IgarashiDepartment of Biomaterial Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5152-7177

Funding

MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 23H00341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wood-rotting fungi play an important role in the global carbon cycle because they are the only known organisms that digest wood, the largest carbon stock in nature. In the present study, we used linear discriminant analysis and random forest (RF) machine learning algorithms to predict white- or brown-rot decay modes from the numbers of genes encoding Carbohydrate-Active enZymes with over 98% accuracy. Unlike other algorithms, RF identified specific genes involved in cellulose and lignin degradation, including auxiliary activities (AAs) family 9 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases, glycoside hydrolase family 7 cellobiohydrolases, and AA family 2 peroxidases, as critical factors. This study sheds light on the complex interplay between genetic information and decay modes and underscores the potential of RF for comparative genomics studies of wood-rotting fungi. IMPORTANCE: Wood-rotting fungi are categorized as either white- or brown-rot modes based on the coloration of decomposed wood. The process of classification can be influenced by human biases. The random forest machine learning algorithm effectively distinguishes between white- and brown-rot fungi based on the presence of Carbohydrate-Active enZyme genes. These findings not only aid in the classification of wood-rotting fungi but also facilitate the identification of the enzymes responsible for degrading woody biomass.

Indexed as

Machine LearningWoodAlgorithmsCarbohydrate MetabolismCelluloseFungal ProteinsFungiLigninRandom ForestCelluloseFungal ProteinsLigninCarbohydrate-Active enZymeslytic polysaccharide monooxygenasemachine learningrandom forest algorithmwood-rotting fungi

Identifiers

PMID38832775
PMCPMC11267879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.