Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38832759›Full record

RevieweLife2024

Statistical and computational methods for integrating microbiome, host genomics, and metabolomics data.

Rebecca A Deek, Siyuan Ma, James Lewis, Hongzhe Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Design, processing, and modeling for longitudinal multiomics microbiome data.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca A DeekDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8783-4694
Siyuan MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, United States.
James LewisDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.
Hongzhe LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-3907

Funding

TRANSGENIC AND CHIMERIC MOUSE COREP30DK050306 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Ken Hashigiwa Cadwell · 1997 to 2026
$32.5M
Statistical Methods for Microbiome and MetagenomicsR01GM123056 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEE, HONGZHE · 2017 to 2025
$3.7M
Methods for Integrative Genomic Data AnalysisR01GM129781 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Hongzhe Lee · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK050306NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK050306NIGMS NIH HHS GM123056NIGMS NIH HHS GM129781NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123056NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129781Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute PPRND-1507-31465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale microbiome studies are progressively utilizing multiomics designs, which include the collection of microbiome samples together with host genomics and metabolomics data. Despite the increasing number of data sources, there remains a bottleneck in understanding the relationships between different data modalities due to the limited number of statistical and computational methods for analyzing such data. Furthermore, little is known about the portability of general methods to the metagenomic setting and few specialized techniques have been developed. In this review, we summarize and implement some of the commonly used methods. We apply these methods to real data sets where shotgun metagenomic sequencing and metabolomics data are available for microbiome multiomics data integration analysis. We compare results across methods, highlight strengths and limitations of each, and discuss areas where statistical and computational innovation is needed.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomicsMetabolomicsMetagenomicsMicrobiotaHumanscausal inferencecomputational biologydata integrationnetwork analysissystems biology

Identifiers

PMID38832759
PMCPMC11149933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.