ArticleJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2024
Abdominal Congestion as a Predictor of Worsening Renal Function in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.
Article in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Worsening renal function is a frequent finding in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and is a powerful independent prognostic factor for adverse outcomes. The link between abdominal congestion and worsening renal function in such patients is not yet fully addressed. Objective: To evaluate the role of abdominal congestion in the early prediction of worsening renal function in hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Methods: This was a prospective study that enrolled 100 patients with a diagnosis of ADHF and received intravenous diuretic therapy. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), splenic Doppler impedance indices and serum prouroguanylin were measured on admission, 24 h after admission and on discharge. Patients were then divided into 2 groups: those who developed WRF (WRF group), and those who did not (non-WRF group). Worsening renal function was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level ≥0.3 mg/dL above baseline admission value. Intrabdominal pressure was measured transvesically using standard Foley catheter. Splenic Doppler impedance indices (resistivity and pulsatility indices) were measured using splenic Doppler ultrasound. Results: Among recruited patients (age: 54.73 ± 13.1 years, 72% are male), there was a significant decline in IAP (6.67 mmHg vs 8.36 mmHg, p = 0.001) and significant rise in splenic resistivity index (0.69 vs 0.67, p = 0.002) before discharge compared to admission values. The median level of serum prouroguanylin before discharge showed significant decline compared to admission level (29.2 vs 34.6 ng/l, p = 0.006). WRF developed in 37 (37%) patients. Independent predictors of WRF during hospitalization were high splenic arterial resistivity index 24 h after admission, high intra-abdominal pressure (≥8 mmHg) 24 h after admission, and low LVEF on admission. Conclusion: In ADHF patients receiving diuretic therapy, transvesical measurement of intra-abdominal pressure and splenic resistivity index by splenic Doppler early after admission can help to identify patients at increased risk of WRF near discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.