Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38832314›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Transcatheter PFO closure for cryptogenic stroke: current approaches and future considerations.

Moemen Eltelbany, Raghav Gattani, Araba Ofosu-Somuah, Abdulla Damluji, Kelly C Epps, Wayne B Batchelor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moemen EltelbanyInova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States.
Raghav GattaniCardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Araba Ofosu-SomuahDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Abdulla DamlujiInova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States.
Kelly C EppsInova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States.
Wayne B BatchelorInova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) is a common congenital atrial septal defect present in 20%-35% of the general population. Although generally considered a benign anatomic variant, a PFO may facilitate passage of a thrombus from the venous to arterial circulation, thereby resulting in cryptogenic stroke or systemic embolization. A PFO is detected in nearly one half of patients presenting with cryptogenic stroke and often considered the most likely etiology when other causes have been excluded. In this review, we discuss the contemporary role of transcatheter closure of PFO in the treatment of cryptogenic stroke, including devices currently available for commercial use in the United States (Amplatzer PFO

Indexed as

congenital atrial septal defectcryptogenic strokePFOPFO closure devicesRoPE score

Identifiers

PMID38832314
PMCPMC11144870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.