Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38832260›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Compartmental modeling for pandemic data analysis: The gap between statistics and models.

Leonidas Sakalauskas, Vytautas Dulskis, Rimas Jonas Jankunas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonidas SakalauskasKlaipeda University, H. Manto st. 84, Klaipeda, LT-92294, Lithuania.
Vytautas DulskisVilnius University Institute of Data Science and Digital Technologies, Akademijos st. 4, Vilnius, LT-08412, Lithuania.
Rimas Jonas JankunasMedical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Mickeviciaus st. 9, Kaunas, LT-44307, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A scrutiny analysis of the COVID-19 data is required to get insights into effective strategies for pandemic control. However, there is a gap between official data and methods used to assess the effectiveness of the potential measures, which was partly addressed in an editorial-letter-type discussion on the impact of the COVID-19 passport in Lithuania. The therein-applied descriptive statistics method provides only limited evidence, while detailed analysis requires more sensitive and reliable methods. In this regard, this paper advocates a maximum likelihood compartmental modeling approach, which provides the flexibility to raise various hypotheses about infection, recovery, and mortality dynamics and to find the most likely answers given the data. Our paper is based on COVID-19 deaths, which are more reliable and essential than infection cases. It should also be noted that officially collected data are unsuitable for in-depth analyses, including compartmental modeling, as they do not capture important information. Overall, this paper does not aim to solve the underlying problems completely but rather stimulate a discussion.

Indexed as

Compartmental modelingCOVID-19COVID-19 deathsCOVID-19 passportsMaximum likelihood estimation

Identifiers

PMID38832260
PMCPMC11145209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.