Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38832257›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A novel randomized scrambling technique for mean estimation of a finite population.

Muhammad Azeem, Asadullah, Musarrat Ijaz, Sundus Hussain, Najma Salahuddin, Abdul Salam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad AzeemDepartment of Statistics, University of Malakand, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
AsadullahDepartment of Statistics, University of Malakand, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Musarrat IjazDepartment of Statistics, Rawalpindi Women University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Sundus HussainDepartment of Statistics, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Najma SalahuddinDepartment of Statistics, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Abdul SalamDepartment of Statistics, University of Malakand, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, the randomized response technique has attracted researchers due to its usefulness in sensitive surveys. The randomized response procedure is used for the collection of responses on sensitive issues such as cheating in examination, income earned through illegal sources, expenditure on luxury items, and amount of tax paid, etc. This study introduces a new variant of quantitative randomized response models for use with sample surveys where the variable of interest is quantitative. The properties of a mean estimator based on the new technique have been studied. Further, the combined and separate evaluation metrics for efficiency and privacy level have also been derived and compared with those of the existing methods. Further, a simulation study has been conducted to prove the improvement in the degree of privacy protection and efficiency. The findings reveal that the suggested randomized response technique is not only more efficient than the existing techniques, but also improves the joint measure of efficiency and respondents' privacy, making it preferable over the existing techniques. A real-world example of a sample survey through the suggested model is also presented which illustrates its usefulness in practical surveys on sensitive issues.

Indexed as

Efficiency comparisonMean estimatorPrivacy levelRandomized responseSensitive variable

Identifiers

PMID38832257
PMCPMC11145346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.