Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38832201›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Newborn Screening in Developing Countries: The Need of the Hour.

Sarika Gaikwad, Shubhangi Ganvir, Punam Uke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarika GaikwadDepartment of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Shubhangi GanvirDepartment of Pediatrics, Grant Medical College and Sir Jamshedjee Jeejeebhoy Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, IND.
Punam UkeDepartment of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening newborns is recognized as an important health policy. It is cost-effective and is implemented as a national health program in most developed countries. Though births in developing countries contribute to more than half of the total births globally, newborn screening (NBS) is not yet implemented in most developing countries. If not diagnosed and treated timely, some of these infants will contribute to neonatal mortality. In contrast, others will have long-term sequelae like developmental delay, learning disabilities, behavioral abnormalities, and backward academic performance in the future. In addition, the diagnosis, management, and treatment of these conditions also carry a significant financial as well as emotional burden on the family. An NBS program can be the most rational and effective way to prevent such morbidities and mortalities. NBS in developing countries competes with other health issues such as the control of infectious diseases, vaccinations, and poor nutrition. Also, lack of government support, poor economy, inadequate public health education, lack of awareness among health care workers, early discharge from hospital, and many births out of hospital are the significant obstacles in the countries that lack total coverage. It is high time now to change our attitude; our focus should be not only on the reduction of mortality and infectious morbidity but also on reducing disabilities with the introduction of screening for newborns. Integrating NBS with the national healthcare system is crucial for successful implementation in developing countries. Integration should also include a payment scheme to reduce the economic burden on families. In recent years, many developing countries have started implementing pilot projects as a step toward the national program of screening newborns.

Indexed as

cost effectivenessdeveloping countriesdried blood spotmental disability.newborn screening program

Identifiers

PMID38832201
PMCPMC11144574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.