ArticleCureus2024
A Prospective Study on the Outcome After Mass Closure of Post-laparotomy Wound Dehiscence in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Tamil Nadu, India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The ideal abdominal wound closure provides strength and a barrier to infection. The major cause of morbidity following any laparotomy is abdominal wound dehiscence. For prompt patient recovery and outcome factors influencing wound healing following mass closure of post-laparotomy, wound dehiscence patients are evaluated in this present study. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome and various complications following mass closure of post-laparotomy wound dehiscence. Materials and methods A prospective study was conducted among 50 patients admitted to the Department of General Surgery, Tamil Nadu, India, with wound dehiscence following emergency and elective laparotomy surgeries managed with mass closure during the study period from 2021 to 2022. The chi-square test and Fischer's exact test were done. Results Mass closure of post-laparotomy wound dehiscence was more common among males (74%, n=37) and less common in the age group 20-30 years (12%, n=6). Prolonged bleeding time and clotting time post-surgery were associated with the type of surgery with a significant p-value of 0.007 and 0.001, respectively, by Fischer's exact test. The presence of urine albumin was also associated with the type of surgery with a significant p-value of 0.02. Surgical site infection (postoperative complication) was associated with the type of surgery and operating time with a significant p-value of 0.004 and 0.03, respectively. Conclusion Abdominal wound dehiscence is a serious and challenging postoperative complication that necessitates immediate intervention. Strict postoperative care places emphasis on reducing the risk of wound infection and other factors related to wound dehiscence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.