ReviewCureus2024
Diverting Stoma-Related Evisceration: A Comprehensive Review of 28 Case Reports Published in the Medical Literature in English.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evisceration is an exceptional complication of diverting a stoma (a common procedure, often considered a minor surgery) with peculiar, specific, features (distinct-to-usual incisional evisceration), due to the presence of a stoma. Available data are limited to a few case reports; some aspects are not fully documented. The results of 28 case reports (full-text articles published in the English literature) were analyzed using 14 variables: age and gender; pathology; surgical setting; index surgery and type of stoma; intended stoma creation; time from surgery to evisceration; type of evisceration; visceral content; cause of evisceration; specific predisposing/risk factors; surgical approach; resection of nonviable content; surgical stoma treatment; and short-term outcome. Urgent surgery resulted in 46.42% resection of nonviable eviscerated content and 7.14% mortality. All issues (some not discussed in previous reviews) were analyzed, to highlight their clinical relevance for surgical practice. The mechanisms (types of evisceration) are different in parastomal and transstomal/intrastomal evisceration; they should be considered as distinct entities. The real (underlying) etiology was identified in 26/28 case reports (92.85%): surgical failure, such as inadequate technique/tactics/strategy (12/26 case reports, 46.15%); trauma (7/26 case reports, 26.92%); and spontaneous necrosis (6/26 case reports, 21.42%). Parastomal hernia and/or prolapse (10/28 case reports, 35.71%) were specific predisposing factors; in such cases, early surgical treatment is recommended. Temporary stoma was a potential risk factor, both for early as well as for late evisceration (e.g., long-standing temporary stoma); in such cases, early take-down or conversion to definitive stoma is beneficial. A local surgical approach (avoiding median laparotomy) was used in 13/28 (46.42%) of case reports. Seven different surgical options were used for surgical stoma treatment, demonstrating versatility; the initial stoma site was preserved in 22/28 (78.57%) of case reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.