Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38832142›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Treed Gaussian processes for animal movement modeling.

Camille J Rieber, Trevor J Hefley, David A Haukos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Camille J RieberDepartment of Statistics and Kansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8680-3237
Trevor J HefleyDepartment of Statistics Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5850-328X
David A HaukosU.S. Geological Survey, Kansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5372-9960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildlife telemetry data may be used to answer a diverse range of questions relevant to wildlife ecology and management. One challenge to modeling telemetry data is that animal movement often varies greatly in pattern over time, and current continuous-time modeling approaches to handle such nonstationarity require bespoke and often complex models that may pose barriers to practitioner implementation. We demonstrate a novel application of treed Gaussian process (TGP) modeling, a Bayesian machine learning approach that automatically captures the nonstationarity and abrupt transitions present in animal movement. The machine learning formulation of TGPs enables modeling to be nearly automated, while their Bayesian formulation allows for the derivation of movement descriptors with associated uncertainty measures. We demonstrate the use of an existing R package to implement TGPs using the familiar Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. We then use estimated movement trajectories to derive movement descriptors that can be compared across individuals and populations. We applied the TGP model to a case study of lesser prairie-chickens (

Indexed as

Bayesian modellesser prairie‐chickenmachine learningmovement modelingpopulation‐level inferencetelemetrytreed Gaussian processeswildlife management

Identifiers

PMID38832142
PMCPMC11144715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.