ArticleEuropean urology open science2024
Can Machine Learning Correctly Predict Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy with Laser Lithotripsy for Kidney Stone Disease? Results from a Large Endourology University Centre.
Article in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Can AI and predictive models accurately predict stone-free status? a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Stone culture, bladder or pelvic urine culture: the most helpful tool for an endourologist - a review of literature from EAU section of endourology.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning-based prediction of Clavien-Dindo ≥ II complications after ureteroscopy.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Beyond Binary Cutoffs: An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Individualized Diagnostic Reasoning in Suspected Urolithiasis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction model for additional procedure requirement in flexible ureterorenoscopy using explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Improved Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections and Urinary Stone Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Patient consent in the modern era: Novel tools and practical considerations in urology.Current urology · 2025Article
- Predictors and associations of complications in ureteroscopy for stone disease using AI: outcomes from the FLEXOR registry.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- A novel predictive method for URS and laser lithotripsy using machine learning and explainable AI: results from the FLEXOR international database.World journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: The integration of machine learning (ML) in health care has garnered significant attention because of its unprecedented opportunities to enhance patient care and outcomes. In this study, we trained ML algorithms for automated prediction of outcomes of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (URSL) on the basis of preoperative characteristics. Methods: Data were retrieved for patients treated with ureteroscopy for urolithiasis by a single experienced surgeon over a 7-yr period. Sixteen ML classification algorithms were trained to investigate correlation between preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes. The outcomes assessed were primary stone-free status (SFS, defined as the presence of only stone fragments <2 mm on endoscopic visualisation and at 3-mo imaging) and postoperative complications. An ensemble model was constructed from the best-performing algorithms for prediction of complications and for prediction of SFS. Simultaneous prediction of postoperative characteristics was then investigated using a multitask neural network, and explainable artificial intelligence (AI) was used to demonstrate the predictive power of the best models. Key findings and limitations: An ensemble ML model achieved accuracy of 93% and precision of 87% for prediction of SFS. Complications were mainly associated with a preoperative positive urine culture (1.44). Logistic regression revealed that SFS was impacted by the total stone burden (0.34), the presence of a preoperative stent (0.106), a positive preoperative urine culture (0.14), and stone location (0.09). Explainable AI results emphasised the key features and their contributions to the output. Conclusions and clinical implications: Technological advances are helping urologists to overcome the classic limits of ureteroscopy, namely stone size and the risk of complications. ML represents an excellent aid for correct prediction of outcomes after training on pre-existing data sets. Our ML model achieved accuracy of >90% for prediction of SFS and complications, and represents a basis for the development of an accessible predictive model for endourologists and patients in the URSL setting. Patient summary: We tested the ability of artificial intelligence to predict treatment outcomes for patients with kidney stones. We trained 16 different machine learning tools with data before surgery, such as patient age and the stone characteristics. Our final model was >90% accurate in predicting stone-free status after surgery and the occurrence of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.