Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38832117›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

Impact of intense sanitization procedures on bacterial communities recovered from floor drains in pork processing plants.

Joseph M Bosilevac, Manita Guragain, Darryll A Barkhouse, Sarah E Velez, Tatum S Katz, Guoqing Lu, Rong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph M BosilevacU.S. Department of Agriculture, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States.
Manita GuragainU.S. Department of Agriculture, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States.
Darryll A BarkhouseInvisible Sentinel - bioMerieux Inc., Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Sarah E VelezInvisible Sentinel - bioMerieux Inc., Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Tatum S KatzU.S. Department of Agriculture, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States.
Guoqing LuDepartment of Biology, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE, United States.
Rong WangU.S. Department of Agriculture, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pork processing plants in the United States (US) cease operations for 24-48 h every six or twelve months to perform intense sanitization (IS) using fogging, foaming, and further antimicrobial treatments to disrupt natural biofilms that may harbor pathogens and spoilage organisms. The impact such treatments have on short-term changes in environmental microorganisms is not well understood, nor is the rate at which bacterial communities return. Methods: Swab samples were collected from floor drains to provide representative environmental microorganisms at two US pork processing plants before, during, and after an IS procedure. Samples were collected from four coolers where finished carcasses were chilled and from four locations near cutting tables. Each sample was characterized by total mesophile count (TMC), total psychrophile count (TPC), and other indicator bacteria; their biofilm-forming ability, tolerance of the formed biofilm to a quaternary ammonium compound (300 ppm, QAC), and ability to protect co-inoculated Results: IS procedures disrupted bacteria present but to different extents depending on the plant and the area of the plant. IS reduced TPC and TMC, by up to 1.5 Log Discussion: The results found here reveal the impact of using IS to disrupt the presence of pathogen or spoilage microorganisms in US pork processing facilities may not have the intended effect.

Indexed as

biofilmmetagenomicspork processingSalmonellasanitization

Identifiers

PMID38832117
PMCPMC11144920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.