Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831998›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. X

Quantitatively Visualizing Bipartite Datasets.

Tal Einav, Yuehaw Khoo, Amit Singer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. X. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tal EinavDivisions of Computational Biology and Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0777-1193
Yuehaw KhooDepartment of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Amit SingerDepartment of Mathematics and PACM, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6975-7955

Funding

Reconstruction of heterogeneous and small macromolecules by cyro-EMR01GM136780 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SINGER, AMIT · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM136780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As experiments continue to increase in size and scope, a fundamental challenge of subsequent analyses is to recast the wealth of information into an intuitive and readily interpretable form. Often, each measurement conveys only the relationship between a pair of entries, and it is difficult to integrate these local interactions across a dataset to form a cohesive global picture. The classic localization problem tackles this question, transforming local measurements into a global map that reveals the underlying structure of a system. Here, we examine the more challenging bipartite localization problem, where pairwise distances are available only for bipartite data comprising two classes of entries (such as antibody-virus interactions, drug-cell potency, or user-rating profiles). We modify previous algorithms to solve bipartite localization and examine how each method behaves in the presence of noise, outliers, and partially observed data. As a proof of concept, we apply these algorithms to antibody-virus neutralization measurements to create a basis set of antibody behaviors, formalize how potently inhibiting some viruses necessitates weakly inhibiting other viruses, and quantify how often combinations of antibodies exhibit degenerate behavior.

Indexed as

Biological PhysicsComputational Physics

Identifiers

PMID38831998
PMCPMC11146982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.