ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
Prognostic stratification of glioblastoma patients by unsupervised clustering of morphology patterns on whole slide images furthering our disease understanding.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- DBSCAN applied to EHRs data from patients with glioblastoma clusters patients based on cytosolic Hsp70 protein, sex, and brain subventricular zone.BioData mining · 2026Article
- AI-driven WHO 2021 classification of gliomas based only on H&E-stained slides.Neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- An unsupervised tool for biomarker discovery and cancer subtyping applied to glioblastoma.BioData mining · 2025Article
- 3D spatial sampling to quantify morphologic heterogeneity in isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype glioblastoma.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2025Article
- Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Prognostic Stratification of Patients With Glioblastoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025Article
- Deep learning models for cervical cancer subtyping using whole slide images.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic stratification of glioblastoma patients by unsupervised clustering of morphology patterns on whole slide images furthering our disease understanding.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Interpretable artificial intelligence based determination of glioma IDH mutation status directly from histology slides.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive malignant tumor of the central nervous system that displays varying molecular and morphological profiles, leading to challenging prognostic assessments. Stratifying GBM patients according to overall survival (OS) from H&E-stained whole slide images (WSI) using advanced computational methods is challenging, but with direct clinical implications. Methods: This work is focusing on GBM (IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO Gr.4) cases, identified from the TCGA-GBM and TCGA-LGG collections after considering the 2021 WHO classification criteria. The proposed approach starts with patch extraction in each WSI, followed by comprehensive patch-level curation to discard artifactual content, i.e., glass reflections, pen markings, dust on the slide, and tissue tearing. Each patch is then computationally described as a feature vector defined by a pre-trained VGG16 convolutional neural network. Principal component analysis provides a feature representation of reduced dimensionality, further facilitating identification of distinct groups of morphology patterns, via unsupervised k-means clustering. Results: The optimal number of clusters, according to cluster reproducibility and separability, is automatically determined based on the rand index and silhouette coefficient, respectively. Our proposed approach achieved prognostic stratification accuracy of 83.33% on a multi-institutional independent unseen hold-out test set with sensitivity and specificity of 83.33%. Discussion: We hypothesize that the quantification of these clusters of morphology patterns, reflect the tumor's spatial heterogeneity and yield prognostic relevant information to distinguish between short and long survivors using a decision tree classifier. The interpretability analysis of the obtained results can contribute to furthering and quantifying our understanding of GBM and potentially improving our diagnostic and prognostic predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.