Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831755›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in physiology2024

Rib cage contributions to inspiratory capacity in patients with cervical spinal cord injury.

Ryo Yoshida, Kenta Kawamura, Yukako Setaka, Hyunjae Woo, Nobuhisa Ishii, Masafumi Mizukami, Hirotaka Mutsuzaki, Kazuhide Tomita

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryo YoshidaGraduate School of Health Science, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Japan.
Kenta KawamuraDepartment of Physical Therapy, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan.
Yukako SetakaGraduate School of Health Science, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Japan.
Hyunjae WooDepartment of Physical Therapy, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan.
Nobuhisa IshiiIbaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
Masafumi MizukamiGraduate School of Health Science, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Japan.
Hirotaka MutsuzakiGraduate School of Health Science, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Japan.
Kazuhide TomitaGraduate School of Health Science, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervical spinal cord injury (CSI) often leads to impaired respiratory function, affecting the overall well-being of patients. This study aimed to investigate the influence of rib cage motion on inspiratory capacity in CSI patients. Methods: We conducted a study with 11 CSI patients, utilising respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP). We measured ventilatory volume by spirometry concurrently with RIP. Participants were instructed to perform maximal inspiratory efforts. Inspiratory capacity (IC) was calculated from spirometry waveforms. We converted the respiratory waveforms of the chest and abdomen into inspiratory volume measured by a spirometer. The inspiratory volume measured by the chest sensor was defined as V Results: The mean IC was 1.828 ± 0.459 L, with the mean V Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of rib cage motion in assessing inspiratory capacity in patients with CSI.

Indexed as

Cervical spinal cord injuryInspiratory capacityRespiratory inductance plethysmographyRib cage motion

Identifiers

PMID38831755
PMCPMC11144717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.