Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831698›Full record

GuidelineDeutsches Arzteblatt international2024

Clinical Practice Guideline: The Treatment of Peripheral Nerve Injuries.

Leila Harhaus, Nora F Dengler, Karsten Schwerdtfeger, Annette Stolle

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leila HarhausDepartment of Handsurgery, Peripheral Nerve Surgery and Rehabilitation, Department of Hand- and Plastic Surgery of Heidelberg University, BG-Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Faculty of Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Klinikum Bad Saarow, Germany; Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Neurosurgery, Homburg/Saar, Germany; Andreas Wentzensen Research Institute, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Nora F Dengler
Karsten Schwerdtfeger
Annette Stolle

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNerve lesions often heal incompletely, leading to lifelong functional impairment and high costs for the health care system. The updated German clinical practice guideline is intended to promote the early recognition of nerve lesions and the timely initiation of proper treatment for optimal restoration of function.

methodsThe recommendations are based on an assessment of all the evidence revealed by a systematic search of the literature, as well as on the expertise of the multiprofessional guideline group.

resultsOnly a few publications contain high-quality evidence. This version of the guideline contains a more detailed discussion of war injuries, iatrogenic injuries, MR neurography, and specific treatments than the previous version. As for the different methods of nerve replacement, a comparison of autologous transplantation versus the use of conduits and tubes revealed no significant difference between these two methods on the mBMRC scale, and minimal superiority of autologous transplantation with respect to two-point discrimination. As for the use of nerve transfers when nerve reconstruction is not feasible or unlikely to succeed, nerve transfer yielded slightly better results than proximal reconstruction for elbow flexion, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (mBMRC ≥ 3: RR 1.16, 95% confidence interval [1.02; 1.32]). The treatment of neuromas with targeted muscle reinnervation was superior to the classic approach in decreasing both stump pain (MD 2.0 +/- 2.8) and phantom limb pain (MD 3.4 +/- 4.03).

conclusionThe delayed or improper treatment of peripheral nerve lesions can lead to severe impairment. Timely diagnosis, the use of appropriate treatments in conformity with the guidelines, and interdisciplinary collaboration among specialists are all essential for optimizing the outcome.

Indexed as

Peripheral Nerve InjuriesGermanyHumansNerve TransferNeurosurgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID38831698
PMCPMC11542565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.