Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831670›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science

An update of the development of motor behavior.

John M Franchak, Karen E Adolph

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John M FranchakDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0751-2864
Karen E AdolphDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2819-134X

Funding

Flexibility of Learning in Infant Skill AcquisitionR37HD033486 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ADOLPH, KAREN E · 2006 to 2015
$4.9M
Flexibility of Learning in Infant Skill AcquisitionR01HD033486 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ADOLPH, KAREN E · 2001 to 2023
$4.5M
Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences 1941449Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01HD033486James S. McDonnell FoundationNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD033486NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD033486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This primer describes research on the development of motor behavior. We focus on infancy when basic action systems are acquired-posture, locomotion, manual actions, and facial actions-and we adopt a developmental systems perspective to understand the causes and consequences of developmental change. Experience facilitates improvements in motor behavior and infants accumulate immense amounts of varied everyday experience with all the basic action systems. At every point in development, perception guides behavior by providing feedback about the results of just prior movements and information about what to do next. Across development, new motor behaviors provide new inputs for perception. Thus, motor development opens up new opportunities for acquiring knowledge and acting on the world, instigating cascades of developmental changes in perceptual, cognitive, and social domains. This article is categorized under: Cognitive Biology > Cognitive Development Psychology > Motor Skill and Performance Neuroscience > Development.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentMotor SkillsCognitionHumansInfantMotor ActivityPsychomotor Performancedevelopmentinfancymotormovementpsychology

Identifiers

PMID38831670
PMCPMC11534565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.