Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831668›Full record

ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2024

A data-driven genome annotation approach for cassava.

Swetha Chenna, Maxim Ivanov, Tue Kjærgaard Nielsen, Karina Chalenko, Evy Olsen, Kirsten Jørgensen, Albin Sandelin, Sebastian Marquardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Swetha ChennaDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiskberg C, 1871, Denmark.
Maxim IvanovDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiskberg C, 1871, Denmark.
Tue Kjærgaard NielsenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiskberg C, 1871, Denmark.
Karina ChalenkoDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiskberg C, 1871, Denmark.
Evy OlsenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiskberg C, 1871, Denmark.
Kirsten JørgensenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiskberg C, 1871, Denmark.
Albin SandelinDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, Copenhagen N, DK2200, Denmark.
Sebastian MarquardtDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, Frederiskberg C, 1871, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1709-2717

Funding

Carlsbergfondet CF18-1075Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond 0135-00094BH2020 European Research Council StG2017-757411Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF15OC0014202Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF19OC0057485Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF21OC0066776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome annotation files play a critical role in dictating the quality of downstream analyses by providing essential predictions for gene positions and structures. These files are pivotal in decoding the complex information encoded within DNA sequences. Here, we generated experimental data resolving RNA 5'- and 3'-ends as well as full-length RNAs for cassava TME12 sticklings in ambient temperature and cold. We used these data to generate genome annotation files using the TranscriptomeReconstructoR (TR) tool. A careful comparison to high-quality genome annotations suggests that our new TR genome annotations identified additional genes, resolved the transcript boundaries more accurately and identified additional RNA isoforms. We enhanced existing cassava genome annotation files with the information from TR that maintained the different transcript models as RNA isoforms. The resultant merged annotation was subsequently utilized for comprehensive analysis. To examine the effects of genome annotation files on gene expression studies, we compared the detection of differentially expressed genes during cold using the same RNA-seq data but alternative genome annotation files. We found that our merged genome annotation that included cold-specific TR gene models identified about twice as many cold-induced genes. These data indicate that environmentally induced genes may be missing in off-the-shelf genome annotation files. In conclusion, TR offers the opportunity to enhance crop genome annotations with implications for the discovery of differentially expressed candidate genes during plant-environment interactions.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantManihotMolecular Sequence AnnotationGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantRNA, PlantTranscriptomeRNA, Plantgene expressiongenome annotationQuant‐seqRNASTRIPE‐seqtrancription

Identifiers

PMID38831668
PMCPMC13087483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.