ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2024
Predictors of SOZ localization, subsequent surgical intervention, and seizure outcomes in iEEG.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA third of the patients who undergo intracranial EEG (iEEG) for seizure-onset zone (SOZ) localization do not proceed to resective surgery for epilepsy, and over half of those who do continue to have seizures following treatment. To better identify candidates who are more likely to see benefits from undergoing iEEG, we investigated preoperative and iEEG peri-operative features associated with the localization of a putative SOZ, undergoing subsequent surgical treatment, and seizure outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent iEEG from 2001 to 2022 at two institutions. Outcomes included SOZ identification, proceeding to surgical treatment (resection vs. neuromodulation), and subsequent seizure freedom.
resultsWe identified 329 unique patients who were followed for a median of 3.9 (IQR:7) years, with a minimum of 2-year follow-up for seizure outcomes analyses. Multivariate analysis identified lateralized and lobar localization on scalp EEG (OR 3.8, p = 0.001) to be associated with SOZ localization. Patients with unilateral localization on scalp EEG (OR 3.0, p = 0.003), unilateral preimplantation hypothesis (OR 3.1, p = 0.001), and lesional preoperative MRI (OR 2.1, p = 0.033) were more likely to undergo resection than neuromodulation. Similarly, a unilateral pre-implantation hypothesis (OR 2.6, p < 0.001) favored seizure freedom, whereas prior neuromodulation (OR 0.3, p = 0.013) decreased the odds. Larger number of preoperative anti-seizure medications (ASMs) did not influence seizure freedom rates but did decrease favorable (Engel I, II) seizure outcomes (OR 0.7, p = 0.026).
interpretationNon-invasive localization data prior to iEEG are associated with subsequent resection and seizure freedom, independent of iEEG localization. Factors predictive of SOZ localization are not necessarily predictive of post-operative seizure freedom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.