Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831472›Full record

ReviewChinese neurosurgical journal2024

Therapy management and outcome of acute hydrocephalus secondary to intraventricular hemorrhage in adults.

Chaoyang Wang, Jianuo Bai, Qiheng He, Yuming Jiao, Wenqian Zhang, Ran Huo, Jie Wang, Hongyuan Xu, Shaozhi Zhao, Zhiyou Wu and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chinese neurosurgical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mechanisms of hydrocephalus after intraventricular haemorrhage: a review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Chaoyang Wang *Department of Neurosurgery, Shenzhen Qianhai Shekou Free Trade Zone Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Jianuo Bai *Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South West 4th Ring Road, Beijing, China.
Qiheng He *Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South West 4th Ring Road, Beijing, China.
Yuming JiaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South West 4th Ring Road, Beijing, China.
Wenqian ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South West 4th Ring Road, Beijing, China.
Ran HuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South West 4th Ring Road, Beijing, China.
Jie WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South West 4th Ring Road, Beijing, China.
Hongyuan XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South West 4th Ring Road, Beijing, China.
Shaozhi ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South West 4th Ring Road, Beijing, China.
Zhiyou WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South West 4th Ring Road, Beijing, China.
Yingfan SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South West 4th Ring Road, Beijing, China.
Qifeng YuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South West 4th Ring Road, Beijing, China.
Jinyi TangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South West 4th Ring Road, Beijing, China.
Xianwei ZengDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Research Center for Rehabilitation Technical Aids, Beijing, China.
Wuyang YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans Street Suite 6007, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. wyang19@jhmi.edu.
Yong CaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.119 South West 4th Ring Road, Beijing, China. caoyong@bjtth.org.

Funding

Key Laboratory and Engineering Center in the Field of Rehabilitation of the Ministry of Civil Affairs 2022GKZS0003Key Laboratory and Engineering Center in the Field of Rehabilitation of the Ministry of Civil Affairs 2022GKZS0004Key Laboratory and Engineering Center in the Field of Rehabilitation of the Ministry of Civil Affairs 2022GKZS0005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) refers to bleeding within the brain's ventricular system, and hydrocephalus is a life-threatening complication of IVH characterized by increased cerebrospinal fluid accumulation in the ventricles resulting in elevated intracranial pressure. IVH poses significant challenges for healthcare providers due to the complexity of the underlying pathophysiology and lack of standardized treatment guidelines. Herein, we performed a systematic review of the treatment strategies for hydrocephalus secondary to IVH.

methodsThis systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023450786). The search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science on July 15, 2023. We included original studies containing valid information on therapy management and outcome of hydrocephalus secondary to primary, spontaneous, and subarachnoid or intracranial hemorrhage following IVH in adults that were published between 2000 and 2023. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) or modified Ranking Scale (mRS) scores during follow-up were extracted as primary outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Cohort Studies or Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 Tool.

resultsTwo hundred and seven patients from nine published papers, including two randomized controlled trials, were included in the analysis. The GOS was used in five studies, while the mRS was used in four. Seven interventions were applied, including craniotomy for removal of hematoma, endoscopic removal of hematoma with/without endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), traditional external ventricular drainage (EVD), and various combinations of EVD, lumbar drainage (LD), and intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF). Endoscopic removal of hematoma was performed in five of nine studies. Traditional EVD had no obvious benefit compared with new management strategies. Three different combinations of EVD, LD, and IVF demonstrated satisfactory outcomes, although more studies are required to confirm their reliability. Removal of hematoma through craniotomy generated reliable result. Generally, endoscopic removal of hematoma with ETV, removal of hematoma through craniotomy, EVD with IVF, and EVD with early continuous LD were useful.

conclusionEVD is still crucial for the management of IVH and hydrocephalus. Despite a more reliable result from the removal of hematoma through craniotomy, a trend toward endoscopic approach was observed due to a less invasive profile.

Indexed as

HydrocephalusIntracerebral hemorrhageIntraventricular hemorrhageManagementSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38831472
PMCPMC11149196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.