Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831460›Full record

SynthesisJournal of translational medicine2024

Systematic review of fatigue severity in ME/CFS patients: insights from randomized controlled trials.

Jae-Woong Park, Byung-Jin Park, Jin-Seok Lee, Eun-Jung Lee, Yo-Chan Ahn, Chang-Gue Son

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jae-Woong ParkKorean Medical College of Daejeon University, 62, Daehak‑Ro, Dong‑Gu, Daejeon, 34520, Republic of Korea.
Byung-Jin ParkKorean Medical College of Daejeon University, 62, Daehak‑Ro, Dong‑Gu, Daejeon, 34520, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Seok LeeResearch Center for CFS/ME, Daejeon Oriental Hospital of Daejeon University, 176 Daedeok‑Daero, Seo‑Gu, Daejeon, 35235, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Jung LeeDepartment of Korean Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, 176 Daedeok‑Daero, Seo‑Gu, Daejeon, 35235, Republic of Korea.
Yo-Chan AhnDepartment of Health Service Management, Daejeon University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Gue SonResearch Center for CFS/ME, Daejeon Oriental Hospital of Daejeon University, 176 Daedeok‑Daero, Seo‑Gu, Daejeon, 35235, Republic of Korea. ckson@dju.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-2034-7429

Funding

Ministry of Education, Science and Technology NRF‑2018R1A6A1A03025221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating illness medically unexplained, affecting approximately 1% of the global population. Due to the subjective complaint, assessing the exact severity of fatigue is a clinical challenge, thus, this study aimed to produce comprehensive features of fatigue severity in ME/CFS patients.

methodsWe systematically extracted the data for fatigue levels of participants in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) targeting ME/CFS from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL throughout January 31, 2024. We normalized each different measurement to a maximum 100-point scale and performed a meta-analysis to assess fatigue severity by subgroups of age, fatigue domain, intervention, case definition, and assessment tool, respectively.

resultsAmong the total of 497 relevant studies, 60 RCTs finally met our eligibility criteria, which included a total of 7088 ME/CFS patients (males 1815, females 4532, and no information 741). The fatigue severity of the whole 7,088 patients was 77.9 (95% CI 74.7-81.0), showing 77.7 (95% CI 74.3-81.0) from 54 RCTs in 6,706 adults and 79.6 (95% CI 69.8-89.3) from 6 RCTs in 382 adolescents. Regarding the domain of fatigue, 'cognitive' (74.2, 95% CI 65.4-83.0) and 'physical' fatigue (74.3, 95% CI 68.3-80.3) were a little higher than 'mental' fatigue (70.1, 95% CI 64.4-75.8). The ME/CFS participants for non-pharmacological intervention (79.1, 95% CI 75.2-83.0) showed a higher fatigue level than those for pharmacological intervention (75.5, 95% CI 70.0-81.0). The fatigue levels of ME/CFS patients varied according to diagnostic criteria and assessment tools adapted in RCTs, likely from 54.2 by ICC (International Consensus Criteria) to 83.6 by Canadian criteria and 54.2 by MFS (Mental Fatigue Scale) to 88.6 by CIS (Checklist Individual Strength), respectively.

conclusionsThis systematic review firstly produced comprehensive features of fatigue severity in patients with ME/CFS. Our data will provide insights for clinicians in diagnosis, therapeutic assessment, and patient management, as well as for researchers in fatigue-related investigations.

Indexed as

FatigueFatigue Syndrome, ChronicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedChronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)Fatigue severityMeta-analysisMyalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)

Identifiers

PMID38831460
PMCPMC11145935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.