Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831453›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2024

Overdose prevention activities led by local public health departments, 2019-2023.

April Wisdom, Stephanie Haddad, Madhumita Govindu, Francis Higgins, Nikki Filion, Kate Sullivan, Cherie Rooks-Peck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

April WisdomCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, MS S106-8, Chamblee, GA, 30341-3717, USA. nmt4@cdc.gov.
Stephanie HaddadCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, MS S106-8, Chamblee, GA, 30341-3717, USA.
Madhumita GovinduCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, MS S106-8, Chamblee, GA, 30341-3717, USA.
Francis HigginsNational Association of City and County Health Officials, Washington, D.C, USA.
Nikki FilionJoselyn Leavy and Associates, New York, USA.
Kate SullivanNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, USA.
Cherie Rooks-PeckCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, MS S106-8, Chamblee, GA, 30341-3717, USA.

Funding

CDC HHS 5 NU38OT000306-03-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug overdose deaths in the United States increased to historic levels in recent years, with provisional estimates indicating more than 111,000 deaths in the 12 months ending July 2023. In 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Overdose Prevention in collaboration with the National Association of City and County Health Officials, funded local health departments (LHDs) to work on overdose prevention activities. This paper aims to: 1) describe the overdose prevention activities that LHDs implemented during the four eighteen-month funding cycles; 2) identify programmatic successes and areas of opportunity for LHDs to consider when implementing future overdose prevention activities; and to 3) inform policy considerations and future overdose prevention programming at the local level.

methodsWe used programmatic data to identify overdose prevention activities implemented by 45 LHDs. Activities were double-coded according to the social-ecological model and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Overdose Prevention Strategies and Guiding Principles. We analyzed final codes to identify distribution and overlap of the Strategies and Guiding Principles across the social ecological model co-occurrences.

resultsApproximately 55.9% (n=123) of the 220 overdose prevention activities that were coded took place at the community level, 32.3% (n=71) at the individual level, 8.6% (n=19) at the relationship level, and 3.2% (n=7) at the policy level. Most of the activities were coded as coordination, collaboration, and integration (n=52, 23.6%), harm reduction (n=51, 23.1%), data and evidence (n=47, 21.4%) or reducing stigma (n=24, 10.9%). Few activities were related to primary prevention (n=14, 6.4%), equity (n=14, 6.4%), recovery support (n=11, 5.0%), and evidence-based treatment (n=7, 3.2%).

conclusionsLocalities have primarily implemented activities focused on the community and individual levels, with most of these centered around coordination, collaboration, and integration; harm reduction; or data and evidence. This study identified gaps in overdose prevention for LHDs related to treatment and health equity and that more interventions should be implemented at the relationship and policy levels. Continuing these efforts is important as LHDs explore opportunities to enhance and expand their work in various strategy areas across the social ecology. Findings from this study may be used to inform localities as they design and implement future overdose prevention activities.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseLocal GovernmentHumansPublic HealthUnited StatesHarm reductionLocal health departmentOpioidOverdosePreventionRecoveryTreatment

Identifiers

PMID38831453
PMCPMC11149216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.