Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831432›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

DREAMER: a computational framework to evaluate readiness of datasets for machine learning.

Meysam Ahangaran, Hanzhi Zhu, Ruihui Li, Lingkai Yin, Joseph Jang, Arnav P Chaudhry, Lindsay A Farrer, Rhoda Au, Vijaya B Kolachalama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meysam AhangaranDepartment of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Hanzhi ZhuDepartment of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Ruihui LiDepartment of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Lingkai YinDepartment of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Joseph JangDepartment of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Arnav P ChaudhryDepartment of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Lindsay A FarrerDepartment of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Rhoda AuDepartment of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Vijaya B KolachalamaDepartment of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. vkola@bu.edu.

Funding

TBDU19AG068753 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Thor Stein · 2020 to 2026
$42.4M
Cognitive Heterogeneity in those with high Alzheimer's Disease RiskRF1AG062109 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI AU, RHODA · 2020 to 2021
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG062109NIA NIH HHS U19 AG068753NIH HHS RF1-AG062109NIH HHS U19-AG068753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML) has emerged as the predominant computational paradigm for analyzing large-scale datasets across diverse domains. The assessment of dataset quality stands as a pivotal precursor to the successful deployment of ML models. In this study, we introduce DREAMER (Data REAdiness for MachinE learning Research), an algorithmic framework leveraging supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques to autonomously evaluate the suitability of tabular datasets for ML model development. DREAMER is openly accessible as a tool on GitHub and Docker, facilitating its adoption and further refinement within the research community..

resultsThe proposed model in this study was applied to three distinct tabular datasets, resulting in notable enhancements in their quality with respect to readiness for ML tasks, as assessed through established data quality metrics. Our findings demonstrate the efficacy of the framework in substantially augmenting the original dataset quality, achieved through the elimination of extraneous features and rows. This refinement yielded improved accuracy across both supervised and unsupervised learning methodologies.

conclusionOur software presents an automated framework for data readiness, aimed at enhancing the integrity of raw datasets to facilitate robust utilization within ML pipelines. Through our proposed framework, we streamline the original dataset, resulting in enhanced accuracy and efficiency within the associated ML algorithms.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsDatasets as TopicHumansSoftwareSupervised Machine LearningUnsupervised Machine LearningData quality measureData readinessFeature engineeringMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38831432
PMCPMC11149315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.