Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831421›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

Multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) randomised selection designs: impact of treatment selection rules on the operating characteristics.

Babak Choodari-Oskooei, Alexandra Blenkinsop, Kelly Handley, Thomas Pinkney, Mahesh K B Parmar

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Babak Choodari-Oskooei *MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, 90 High Holborn, WC1V 6LJ, London, United Kingdom. b.choodari-oskooei@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7679-5899
Alexandra Blenkinsop *Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2328-8671
Kelly HandleyBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4036-2375
Thomas PinkneyInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7320-6673
Mahesh K B ParmarMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, 90 High Holborn, WC1V 6LJ, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/09Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004_09National Institute for Health and Care Research 16/31/123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMulti-arm multi-stage (MAMS) randomised trial designs have been proposed to evaluate multiple research questions in the confirmatory setting. In designs with several interventions, such as the 8-arm 3-stage ROSSINI-2 trial for preventing surgical wound infection, there are likely to be strict limits on the number of individuals that can be recruited or the funds available to support the protocol. These limitations may mean that not all research treatments can continue to accrue the required sample size for the definitive analysis of the primary outcome measure at the final stage. In these cases, an additional treatment selection rule can be applied at the early stages of the trial to restrict the maximum number of research arms that can progress to the subsequent stage(s). This article provides guidelines on how to implement treatment selection within the MAMS framework. It explores the impact of treatment selection rules, interim lack-of-benefit stopping boundaries and the timing of treatment selection on the operating characteristics of the MAMS selection design.

methodsWe outline the steps to design a MAMS selection trial. Extensive simulation studies are used to explore the maximum/expected sample sizes, familywise type I error rate (FWER), and overall power of the design under both binding and non-binding interim stopping boundaries for lack-of-benefit.

resultsPre-specification of a treatment selection rule reduces the maximum sample size by approximately 25% in our simulations. The familywise type I error rate of a MAMS selection design is smaller than that of the standard MAMS design with similar design specifications without the additional treatment selection rule. In designs with strict selection rules - for example, when only one research arm is selected from 7 arms - the final stage significance levels can be relaxed for the primary analyses to ensure that the overall type I error for the trial is not underspent. When conducting treatment selection from several treatment arms, it is important to select a large enough subset of research arms (that is, more than one research arm) at early stages to maintain the overall power at the pre-specified level.

conclusionsMulti-arm multi-stage selection designs gain efficiency over the standard MAMS design by reducing the overall sample size. Diligent pre-specification of the treatment selection rule, final stage significance level and interim stopping boundaries for lack-of-benefit are key to controlling the operating characteristics of a MAMS selection design. We provide guidance on these design features to ensure control of the operating characteristics.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignAdaptive Clinical Trials as TopicHumansPatient SelectionSample SizeAdaptive trial designsFamilywise type I error rateMAMSMulti-arm multi-stage randomised clinical trialsROSSINI-2 trialTreatment selection

Identifiers

PMID38831421
PMCPMC11145876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.