Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831392›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Pseudarthrosis risk factors in lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Win Boonsirikamchai, Sirichai Wilartratsami, Monchai Ruangchainikom, Ekkapoj Korwutthikulrangsri, Sasima Tongsai, Panya Luksanapruksa

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Association of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis with postoperative outcomes following surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Incidence and predictors of early and late reoperation after primary lumbar spine fusion: a 10-year retrospective cohort study of 1,356 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Absence of bone marrow edema on early postoperative MRI predicts fusion outcome after single-level lumbar interbody fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Osteoporosis and osteoporosis therapies as determinants of implant fixation failure in arthroplasty and spinal fusion constructs: a position statement from the Fracture Working Group of the Council of Scientific Advisors of the International Osteoporosis Foundation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of nonunion on patient-related outcomes after single level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: A propensity score-matched analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Win BoonsirikamchaiDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Wang Lang Rd., Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9470-4935
Sirichai WilartratsamiDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Wang Lang Rd., Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7651-4196
Monchai RuangchainikomDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Wang Lang Rd., Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0525-6390
Ekkapoj KorwutthikulrangsriDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Wang Lang Rd., Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0136-1046
Sasima TongsaiOffice for Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Wang Lang Rd., Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2310-8888
Panya LuksanapruksaDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Wang Lang Rd., Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. panya.luk@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9554-4259

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of pseudarthrosis risk factors following lumbar fusion procedures. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used for outcome measurements. The objective of this study was to identify the independent risk factors for pseudarthrosis after lumbar spinal fusion, which is crucial for mitigating morbidity and reoperation. Systematic searches in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus (1990-July 2021) were conducted using specific terms. The inclusion criteria included prospective and retrospective cohorts and case‒control series reporting ORs with 95% CIs from multivariate analysis. The quality assessment utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis, employing OR and 95% CI, assessed pseudarthrosis risk factors in lumbar fusion surgery, depicted in a forest plot. Of the 568 abstracts identified, 12 met the inclusion criteria (9 retrospective, 2006-2021). The 17 risk factors were categorized into clinical, radiographic, surgical, and bone turnover marker factors. The meta-analysis highlighted two significant clinical risk factors: age (95% CI 1.02-1.11; p = 0.005) and smoking (95% CI 1.68-5.44; p = 0.0002). The sole significant surgical risk factor was the number of fused levels (pooled OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.17-1.55; p < 0.0001). This study identified 17 risk factors for pseudarthrosis after lumbar fusion surgery, emphasizing age, smoking status, and the number of fusion levels. Prospective studies are warranted to explore additional risk factors and assess the impact of surgery and graft type.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraePseudarthrosisSpinal FusionAge FactorsHumansRisk FactorsSmokingLumbar fusionLumbar vertebraePseudarthrosisRisk factorsSpinal fusion

Identifiers

PMID38831392
PMCPMC11149252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.