Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831247›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2024

Clinician Views of Proactive Tobacco Treatment Programs: A Qualitative Evaluation.

Anne C Melzer, Megan E Campbell, Hildi J Hagedorn, Steve S Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne C MelzerCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA. acmelzer@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6966-7848
Megan E CampbellCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Hildi J HagedornCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Steve S FuCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Electronic Proactive Outreach for Smokers with COPD: Engaging patients to quitIK2HX003067 · VA · MINNEAPOLIS VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Anne Catherine Melzer · 2020 to 2026
–
Health Services Research and Development HX003067-01A1HSRD VA IK2 HX003067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProactive tobacco treatment programs are an evidence-based strategy to recruit patients who smoke to make supported quit attempts. However, such programs are rarely implemented. We performed a qualitative assessment of clinicians to inform the creation of a proactive outreach program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who smoke.

methodsInformed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted semi-structured interviews to assess clinician views of proactive outreach, including barriers, program structure, and the use of technology. Clinicians included primary and specialty care physicians, nurses and advanced practice providers, pharmacists, respiratory therapists, a psychologist, and relevant members of leadership. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using directed content analysis.

resultsClinicians in all roles identified that proactive outreach could be an effective use of resources to help patients with COPD who smoke quit with several advantages over the current state. Clinicians disagreed on the priority population (e.g., younger patients, sicker patients), and to some extent on whether proactive outreach is a clinical priority. Though they supported that technology could be part of the outreach program, most advocated for multiple avenues (phone calls, drop-in clinic, texting), as these patients were perceived to be low technology utilizers. The primary implementation barriers were competing priorities and cost, as well as unclear billing and staffing models.

conclusionsClinicians support proactive outreach for patients with COPD, but the optimal way to structure, staff, and fund such programs remains unclear. Health systems should leverage implementation strategies to speed uptake of these potentially life-saving programs.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQualitative ResearchSmoking CessationFemaleHumansMaleProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38831247
PMCPMC11306907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.