ReviewNature protocols2024
Real-time imaging of axonal membrane protein life cycles.
Review in Nature protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- G6PD facilitates axon regeneration via clathrin-mediated endocytosis.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- On The Retrograde Transport of RNA-Loaded Lipid Nanoparticles Designed for Brain Delivery.ACS nanoscience Au · 2025Article
- Sculpting excitable membranes: voltage-gated ion channel delivery and distribution.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025Review
- Enhanced trafficking of an inherited erythromelalgia NaNeurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The construction of neuronal membranes is a dynamic process involving the biogenesis, vesicular packaging, transport, insertion and recycling of membrane proteins. Optical imaging is well suited for the study of protein spatial organization and transport. However, various shortcomings of existing imaging techniques have prevented the study of specific types of proteins and cellular processes. Here we describe strategies for protein tagging and labeling, cell culture and microscopy that enable the real-time imaging of axonal membrane protein trafficking and subcellular distribution as they progress through some stages of their life cycle. First, we describe a process for engineering membrane proteins with extracellular self-labeling tags (either HaloTag or SNAPTag), which can be labeled with fluorescent ligands of various colors and cell permeability, providing flexibility for investigating the trafficking and spatiotemporal regulation of multiple membrane proteins in neuronal compartments. Next, we detail the dissection, transfection and culture of dorsal root ganglion sensory neurons in microfluidic chambers, which physically compartmentalizes cell bodies and distal axons. Finally, we describe four labeling and imaging procedures that utilize these enzymatically tagged proteins, flexible fluorescent labels and compartmentalized neuronal cultures to study axonal membrane protein anterograde and retrograde transport, the cotransport of multiple proteins, protein subcellular localization, exocytosis and endocytosis. Additionally, we generated open-source software for analyzing the imaging data in a high throughput manner. The experimental and analysis workflows provide an approach for studying the dynamics of neuronal membrane protein homeostasis, addressing longstanding challenges in this area. The protocol requires 5-7 days and expertise in cell culture and microscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.